I have been struck over the last week with how an
inability to express oneself can hamper you, not only in the pursuit of higher
ambition, but in ordinary, everyday life. Some - many, perhaps - are content to
exist in a state of ignorant bliss, but plenty are frustrated when they know
what they want to say but are not equipped with a suitable armoury of literary sidearms
with which to engage the enemy. Literacy is truly the cornerstone of personal development.
My trainee electrician candidates have just taken a
relatively simple examination. Some questions are numbers related, which is disadvantageous
enough for anybody blighted by a standard British state education, but the
majority require candidates to explain principles which, for some, presents a
near-insurmountable obstacle. I find that students for whom English is a second
language manage where the British born struggle. How did we get to such a
parlous, precarious state?
The where-we’re-were and their-there-they’re conundrum is
just the tip of an iceberg of incompetence where[were?] the correct
form is the exception rather than the rule. Punctuation is either non-existent
or entirely random, following generations of teaching that spelling,
punctuation and grammar can be brushed aside because the context will yield
comprehension. But what can you make of the following, where the question asks
“Explain how the split-phase effect is achieved in an induction start
single-phase motor”?
“The induction start single phase motor uses an
induction affect[sic] to course[sic] a
split phase effect when starting in a single phase motor starting to make the
make[sic] the split phase motor run as an induction motor
when it starts in star but uses the split to make induction turn the motor when
it starts”
It goes on, but at no point does it begin to answer the
question and it is not entirely clear that the writer realises this. Maybe it’s
a bluff in the hope that a marker will see some key words and award some
credit, but it is sadly not atypical. But why is it happening at all? It cannot
be that, as a former leading world nation, we are unable to educate our young sufficiently
to be capable of understanding the issues and making valuable contributions to our
society beyond being grunt economic units.
It give credence to theories that it is deliberate – keep
them dumb, stunt their ability to question and reason so they accept whatever
bullshit they are fed. And if they ever try to be heard, render their arguments
unintelligible. Then flood the country with under-paid foreign labour and call
the locals racist if they object. Hammer home the message that it is we, the
inbred itinerants who are the problem, even when it is clear we are not. When
some try to rebel, say that ‘populism’ (democracy) is the same as Nazism, that the
UK looks like 1930s Germany, that we are fomenting civil war…
But what of those who are educated and who have made
successful careers for themselves; those who are beyond the influence of shameful
labels? How do you render their voices impotent? Easy; frame success as unfairness.
Label as millionaires those who have worked all their lives and spent their
money wisely. Claim they conspire to back the forces of capitalism, which seeks
to grind the poor into ever finer dust. Did anybody mention Corbyn?
In the war of words, you first have to disarm your enemy.
Hell, it’s even more effective if you also disarm your own side. Then you can
mobilise mobs of chanting goons who will endlessly repeat meaningless slogans,
no matter how ridiculous they sound. And those who oppose you will be reduced
to slinging back equally ill-founded arguments whose barbs will not stick to
the tough hides of your illiterate army. And this is what passes for political
debate these days? There are no words.
And of course, you introduce Newspeak - but call it 'compassionate political correctness'. An uneducated peasantry cannot even begin to express dissent if the necessary terms are non-existant in their minds/vocabularies.
ReplyDelete