Year on year I find that candidates for the technical building
services qualifications I deliver are less and less able to learn without chopping
up the subject matter into bite-sized chunks. And of course, once you start
cutting up their meat for them, they want it guided on demand into their reluctantly
waiting mouths. How soon before we also have to chew it for them?
Yesterday, however, I had the rare experience of
assessing two candidates for their inspection and testing practical task who
were entirely competent. They did the work efficiently, sensibly and without
fuss and demonstrated a thorough grasp of the reason behind every part of the
process. Proceeding to fault finding they both also showed an excellent understanding
and were able to explain their processes clearly and propose good, practical
rectification procedures.
It is a shame, therefore, that they end up with only the
same recorded attainment as those who rely entirely on rote-learned procedures
and regurgitated stock phrases which, while providing a workaday route to
completing the qualification, hardly inspire confidence. Some fully-qualified electricians
are more equal than other fully-qualified electricians.
And just as in the broader world of education the poorly educated
become the educators, looking for ways to make their lives easier. Every time
assessments are reviewed and revised the apparent aim is to make attainment
easier; the tail always wags the dogs as with any bureaucracy. Rigour disappeared
a long time ago under a tidal wave of requirements to de-colonise curricula,
increase whatever diversity is actually supposed to mean, and of course, to ‘leave
nobody behind’.
Imagine my dismay, then, on finding that examination
boards in the UK are looking at ways of examining GCSE and A-Level qualifications
online. Worse, they are considering adaptive testing, whereby a less able
student is given an assessment more suited to their level. Where does this end
up, with everybody being awarded an A* for every subject? As we say here, we
can explain it to you, but we can’t understand it for you.
For many, the thirst for knowledge just isn’t there. The school
experience has prepared them for a life of having everything explained by
others and carrying out work tasks in a perfunctory manner, much as in the old
Soviet system – “we pretend to work, you pretend to pay us”. Few, in my
experience, even see the value in reading. And we let these people vote, drive
vehicles and procreate (not necessarily at the same time).
I scan the horizon, but I can’t see any signs of hope, I
really can’t. Each iteration of Homo sapiens appears to tend further
towards Homo incognitans. Maybe it’s a good thing. At some future point
when humans have lost the ability to reason, to communicate, to even use basic
tools, maybe we will be less of a risk to the planet and we can revert back to being
packs of hunter-gathering primates and learn to amble along on our knuckles
again. I suspect we will be happier for it.
This is why firms have tests for inexperienced starters. Basic tests and the laughs we have had with some of the results. Of course as time moves on we will find that there will be few competent people around and a new class of people will be created.
ReplyDeleteIt seems that with each iteration of smart technology we produce a progressively less smart user. But it's okay because to keep pace we aggrandise the job titles. So fitter becomes technician, technician becomes engineer and engineer becomes omniscient god... who then goes into politics.
Delete