Dear Employers,
You have a choice between two systems.
System A allows
you to hire whoever you wish without fear of censure; those you believe are
best able to work productively and who will, during working hours, devote their
energies to the furtherance of the company’s business priorities. You may
negotiate directly with them over matters of pay and conditions, disciplinary issues,
holiday entitlement and employ them only for so long as you find the
arrangement mutually beneficial.
Under System B,
which is a kinder, gentler way of doing business, you will still be able to
employ the best of the applicants, but those applicants must include mandatory
quotas of various diverse groups such as: those who identify as non-binary
gender, women of child-bearing age, the differently-abled (both mentally and
physically), persons of colour (ideally a good mix of all shades), vibrant
religions (Christians need not apply), refugees and any other ‘persecuted
minorities’, as decided by outside agencies.
System B companies will employ workers under arrangements
largely determined by a wide range of external interested parties who will
treat the company entity as a hostile enterprise and make secondary the
creation of profit. For kinder, gentler policies to work the rights of the work
force must be held supreme at all times and the means of production must,
necessarily, function at the convenience of said workers.
Under System A, a company will have to openly compete with
other companies; the one which produces the better product at the right price
will occupy the market-leading position and force its competitors to match its efficiencies.
The demand for product will determine how much is supplied and price will be
settled by these natural market forces acting in concert. Companies may also
compete for talent and pay whatever is needed to recruit the best managers and
directors.
System B entities will produce what central planning
determines and sell it at a price set by a workers’ committee. To keep prices affordable
for all, wages will also be controlled by the same central planning authorities,
which will also monitor work force wellbeing and determine whether and if the
company needs to spend more on such welfare. Fairness will be at the very heart
of this system and no boss – recruited internally from the general worker population
- will earn more than twice the wage of the average employee.
The population under System A will have to budget and make its
own decisions about how it spends its income. You will have to cut your cloth
to suit and although there will be an abundance of a huge variety of produce of
all kinds you won’t be able to afford all you desire. Instead you will be free
to set your own spending priorities and be full liable for all costs and debts
incurred. This will mean that the profligate may suffer by their own
recklessness.
On the other hands, in System B, you will be absolutely free
to select from the far more limited variety of products available. The choices
will have been decided for you by various experts, who have only your best
interests at heart, but be aware that there may be gluts and shortages at
times. Rationing may be introduced to ensure that everybody gets their fair
share, but the price of such measures will be borne by the companies
responsible. Be assured, however, that everybody will get what they deserve in
the end.
So, there you are; a simple choice. Do you want the free
agency of the open market, with all the risks and rewards it brings? A world in
which nothing is certain but where fortunes may be made and lost and an
infinite variety of possibilities exists? Or would you prefer the kinder,
gentler certainties of a predictable, planned economy; a world in which
everybody has a place and knows it. Choose wisely.
Good analogy, got it in a nutshell.
ReplyDelete