Monday, 24 July 2017

Scared? Damn right we’re scared

There is something sinister going on with islam and the authorities’ refusal to tak hat is perceived as a threat to our way of life seriously. Say that there are non-muslim no-go areas and you are shouted down with screeches of ‘racist!’  Point to the evidence and if they can’t ignore you, you hear guff about payback for colonialism, the fatuous mantra that ‘immigration is a net benefit’ and of course, diversity. How about this 2016 piece about the new diversity of SavileTown in West Yorkshire?

Yes, I know the Daily Mail is regarded as a banned publication by the bastions of free speech at the Ministry of Truth – the Guardian/BBC Axis – but this isn’t a hate piece. This is what millions of ordinary people see while they are hearing about our wonderful inclusive multiculturality. It’s the sort of cognitive onslaught that might be endured while undergoing brainwashing in a 1960s-style psychological thriller. No wonder people are afraid.

Yes afraid; not because of any imagined, hyped-up, far-right propaganda but through direct experience. We see barbaric acts of terror our screens daily. We have been subjected to relentless images of slaughter of the most brutal kind. And we hear daily how an enormous proportion of the ‘muslim community’ simply refuses to condemn any of it. For every reformist muslim paraded on television in refutation of our suspicions, there are thousands who nod in silent approval and thousands more who are happy to take to street praying in an insensitive and open act of defiance.

But we are the bad guys. The Metropolitan police published a report on hate crime against London’s muslim communities (I don’t recall seeing anything similar on hate crime against all of civilisation) in which they spell out what they regard as islamophobia (page 6).According to the definition they use, there are 8 components of islamophobia to wit:
  1. Islam is seen as a monolithic bloc, static and unresponsive to change.
  2. Islam is seen as separate and 'other'. It does not have values in common with other cultures, is not affected by them and does not influence them.
  3. Islam is seen as inferior to the West. It is seen as barbaric, irrational, primitive and sexist.
  4. Islam is seen as violent, aggressive, threatening, supportive of terrorism and engaged in a 'clash of civilisations'.
  5. Islam is seen as a political ideology and is used for political or military advantage.
  6. Criticisms made of the West by Islam are rejected out of hand.
  7. Hostility towards Islam is used to justify discriminatory practices towards Muslims and exclusion of Muslims from mainstream society.
  8. Anti-Muslim hostility is seen as natural or normal.

Well, the first six seem to be the entirely normal observations of what islam actually is in the west and the last two appear to be the almost justifiable reactions of some in seeking to protect themselves from further assaults on our own culture. As a small, but typical, example, take the case of the woman suing a school for banning full face coverings. This is nothing to do with religion and everything to do with an invading ideology imposing its will on the kuffar. If they can ban the burka in Morocco why should such consideration be deemed oppressive in Britain? But what do we do? We attempt to place more and more muslims in positions of power over us; the police are also guilty of this.

It is as if the police force, who once it was once assumed used to defend without prejudice the law of the land now seems determined to thwart those aims. Bandits wear face masks; bank robbers, rapists; villains of all persuasions. In our culture (and how come there are no white British ‘community leaders’?) hiding the face is a mark of shame. Maybe the police should wear masks now? Fight back? We aren’t done fighting among ourselves.


  1. I would slightly alter the observations about Islam.

    1. Islam is not unresponsive to change. Rather, when change happens, it digs its feet in & becomes more regressive. It circles the wagons. Take the de-evolution of much of the muslim world over the last 50 years. Iran, Egypt, Afghanistan in particular.

    2. Islam is not just separate. The Amish or mennonites are 'separate', but passively so. Islam must be not separate, but rather must be dominant & occupy a position of supremacy by attacking & undermining the host society. If it was separate, they wouldnt be demanding more representation in parliament. They would seek to establish their own courts & laws. Of course they do that too, but they also seek to influence & finally subvert ours.

    3. Islam paradoxically knows itself as inferior, not only to the west, but to all. That is why it puts so much emphasis on destroying everything unislamic. Be it buddhist statues in Afghanistan, or pre-islamic culture in Egypt. The only way Islam can look good is through destruction of literally everything else, because literally everything else makes Islam look inferior purely by existing.

    4. Throughout most of its 1400 years Islam has proven it is violent. There is only the house of Islam & house of war.

    5. Well, it is. Muslims prove this continually. They make no attempt to hide the fact they act as a hive mind to ensure dhimmi labour politicians are chosen & elected.

    6. Not just rejected. But act as a mark to ostracize and victimize anyone who dares to be critical of Islam. Naturally people are going to question things they arent allowed to question.

    7 & 8. Again, what is the alternative. In what muslim majority country is it desirable to be a minority? What are the exceptions? Why are non-muslims in Britain going to be treated any better than non-muslims in any other country muslims have colonized. Treat people as you want to be treated at first for sure. If they fail to reciprocate, treat them as they treat you. That there has been no massive campaign of violence towards the muslim community given the rates of terrorism & grooming, the tolerance of the white non-muslim community can only be described as exceptional.

    I'm not surprised their list is weak. The truth is far more horrible than they dare admit.

    1. Excellent response. Thank you.