My timeline filled up last night with a debate on education
to which I wasn’t really party, although I read most of the comments this
morning and it was clear that the more literate contributor was all in favour
of grammar schools, while the one with spelling issues bewailed his treatment
as a second class citizen in what used to be called a secondary modern. I went
to both, in that my ‘big school’ in a small northern market town was called Thirsk
Grammar and Secondary Modern School, despite it being located in the village of
Sowerby.
Anyhow, regardless of this quirk of geography, here we
toiled at our desks with not a computer in sight, nor any form of what is now
called edu-tech. The desks had inkwells and the teachers’ cupboards still
contained stores of school ink, although we had by then progressed to cartridge
pens. Biros, being the work of some form of handwriting destroying demon, were banned
in order to save our souls. The teachers wrote with chalk on actual blackboards
and had leather elbow patches on well-worn tweed jackets and not one of them
attempted to be down with the kids.
Since then, of course, there have been many modifications
to the education system, resulting in more and more spending, a progressively
higher turnover of teachers and a steady decline in educational standards to
the point where – if headlines are to be believed – British children without an
academic bent are unemployable in the modern multicultural world, even as
cleaners and hospital porters.
And yet, for all its modernity and high tech, flashing
gadgetry, it is arguable that you can navigate life today far easier and with
far less learning than it took a few decades ago. With all the world’s knowledge
available via a smart phone, and goods and services searchable in seconds, all
you need to make your way in the world is what the school leavers of half a
century ago had in abundance; literacy, numeracy and good manners. Nobody needs
degrees in David Beckham. Seriously, nobody.
As coincidence would have it, my old Royal Navy shipmate,
Konrad, called last night and we ended up discussing apprentice training. He is
writing courses for an engineering college and I am about to prep for a new
class of electricians under training and we were both concerned that with each
passing decade we seem to have to start further back. Once, an apprentice would
start at fifteen and despite not being academically gifted could cope well
enough with electrical science principles to pass the ‘mathsy’ part of the
course with the aid of logarithm and trigonometry tables. Now, the calculator
users turn up unable to explain a square root and somewhat resentful that we
have to re-teach them elementary maths before we can get to the good stuff.
The teachers, well some of them, were striking last
Thursday, out in support of other public sector workers against ‘the cuts’. They should have a good look at what we used
to achieve with so much less and go on strike to demand even more cuts. Less
really can be more. Cut out all the unnecessary crap – the costly electronic
whiteboards, the iPads, the gimmicks and much of the pedagogic propaganda.
Particularly cut out the notion that all must have prizes. As more and more
qualifications are handed out like cheap sweets it’s no wonder we now have
graduates who are grateful to find work in coffee shops.
Time to make more bricks...
None of this, by the way, is the fault of the kids
themselves, but a two or three generational slide into apathy and mediocrity
across society must surely shoulder the burden of the blame. You simply have to
select and stream and yes, you have to condemn also. Those who will not or
cannot meet higher academic standards must not be allowed to drag down those
who can. And if you can’t achieve that in a single school then yes, segregated
schooling may be necessary. Even then, it will take another two or three
generations until we restore the standards we had in the nineteen fifties, but
it will be worth the wait; all in all we need plenty more bricks in the wall.
Your Thirsk Grammar School sounds just like the one I attended, and despite the lack of computers (they'd never been heard of), something like 90% of pupils who completed the 'A' level years went on to University when a degree meant something.
ReplyDeleteSelection was by the "11 plus" exam, passing meant a place at the Grammar, failing meant consigned to the secondary modern, but there was a third option for the "almost passed" boys, the technical collage, from where some managed to obtain enough 'O' levels to attend the grammar at 'A' level standard.