What’s that I hear? The Labour Party is in disarray? Who
would have thought it? Ten decades after its birth for all the honourable
reasons this is now a party without a mission, except possibly a visceral
desire to drag us back to their glory days of post-war euphoria and an end to…
and end to what, exactly? For all the former might of the trades unions, the
poor are still poor, at least partly as a result of thirteen years of Labour government
from whose shadow we seem to be finally emerging. And by many measures the poor
of today are far less satisfied with their lot than before they expected so very
much. Such a cruel trick, to dangle aspirational baubles in front of people’s
eyes only to snatch them back just as they come within reach.
So no wonder this week’s Prime Minister’s Questions
seemed to be devoted entirely to the NHS. The only thing left in the boy
Miliband’s armoury and it went down like a five-bob whore; a deeply uncommitted
and unsatisfying performance, all over so quickly and leaving only the aftertaste
of shame. The NHS is the fourth largest employer on the planet and so vast is
it that its internal momentum is as incapable of reacting to one-term government
quick-fixes as a super tanker is of performing an emergency stop.
And of course, despite the fanciful, bleeding heart imaginings,
the NHS is far from broke. It consumes a vastly disproportionate amount of our
national resources because of its cumbersome bulk. But for every confected
sob-story of waiting lists and supposedly preventable deaths, for every genuine grievance brought to the dazzling glare of publicity, there are a thousand
perfectly satisfied customers. And unlike many countries throughout the world
nobody dies just because they can’t afford healthcare.
Labour did nothing to tame the monster, so what makes Ed think
their sentimental worship of the sacred National Health cow will convince
voters otherwise? As he spoke in the Commons his cabinet cringed behind him.
Not a thing to say on the economy, the cost of living crisis forgotten, and employment
figures making a laughing stock of their pretend-job guarantee, Ed was way out on
his own, banging on about the NHS. Again. Meanwhile his party briefed against him in snippets of leaked reportage.
And then at the end of the week they let him talk about
business – something he knows nothing about – to businessmen, who know quite a lot
about it. Their verdict? Ed knows nothing about it. Forgetting,
perhaps, that business people are also ordinary men and women with views on international
trade and partnerships and exports and balances of payments and politically
rigged marketplaces, he once again misjudged his audience and their interests.
It is not just Unite who favour a referendum on the EU.
But wait, how did this happen at all? Wasn’t this
supposed to be Labour’s NHS – the only thing we have left – week? Dan Hodges
certainly thought so and rolled up a copy of his Telegraph blog with which to
beat the errant Miliband from behind his own lines. The real horror though, is that as disorganised as they
are, as poor a one-nation leader-figure as Ed is, there is still a chance that Labour
have enough people too stupid to realise that if they vote Labour they’ll get a
man they’ve already decided isn’t up to the job they would vote him into… and
then what? A Miliband government would be torn to shreds in weeks and maybe they
secretly admit to this.
Daddy was a Marxist so, yah,
I know all about business...
Could it be that Ed’s team is playing a longer game? A
leadership challenge now gives too little time to regroup behind a new figurehead;
besides which, who is there left? But putting Miliband in number 10 is too
dreadful to contemplate unless you’re a big fan of collective bargaining and
one out, all out. Also, the longer any government is in power, the less popular
they become. So maybe the strategy of Labour’s real leaders is to sit this one
out, let Ed lose and thus give themselves another six years from now to think
up a policy. Let’s face it; it’s taken them four years to come up with absolutely fuck-all.
This is going exactly the same way as Maggie's first re-run. Her popularity was low and Labour's Kinnock was, like Miliband, weak and not that well thought of by the public. Unfortunately Maggie had a plan, unlike Kinnock, she gave the order to sink the Belgrano, even though it was heading home and was out of the 'kill zone'. This proved to be her saving grace, the rest, as they say, is history!
ReplyDeleteI fear the dead hand of the CIA ensuing a Labour victory at the 2015 GE, we have already seen them comment in the American national interest of the UK being in the EU.
ReplyDeleteYesterday we learn that the septics have been caught once again spying on Germany, it is now realised that America is out of control, it does not know it's friends from mugs enemies.
So for me the only reason Labour are holding out on the EU referendum is they have been told to prepare for government by the Americans. You only have to look at the shenanigans of Tower Hamlets to understand how easy it will be for the Americans to seriously interfere in our GE to get the result of a compliant fool into number 10 ensuring no EU referendum.
And I am not a conspiracy theorist, just can see the wood through the trees