Dig coal out of the ground, likewise iron ore and use the
two to make steel with which to build our world. Till the soil, cultivate crops
and turn the produce into sustenance for the workers. Design things, erect
factories, make those things and distribute them to where they are in demand.
Teach young people what they need to know to be able to participate in the
myriad activities that generate wealth. Also teach them how society works, and
teach them their duties and responsibilities towards others.
Make, build, fix, deliver... and repeat. Busy hands,
encouraged by the prospect of better lives, create riches, tangible riches that
can be used to provide the less easily auditable services that are often a loss
on the balance sheet. Hospitals to treat those who need it. A justice system
that can be used to protect us all from the minority who can’t be persuaded to
eschew their destructive urges. And a safety net of welfare and social care to
look after those who simply cannot look after themselves.
Isn’t this the basis for a civilised society? Every piece
of the jigsaw should contribute to the finished picture; you can’t just tip in
the contents of half-finished jigsaws of a completely different image. The only
way you can fit the alien pieces into the national canvas is by removing or
deforming what was there before. Or by insisting that the corrupted and
unpleasant mish-mash that results was what the box lid promised all along.
The picture may be continually evolving, but if it doesn’t
improve it, it shouldn’t be in the box. The meddlesome imposition of ever more perverse
ways of disposing of the wealth we create and of distorting the society we want
to live in is destructive. The separation of rights from responsibilities by
the ever more bizarre outcomes of the human rights industry is simply
irresponsible. The insistence on enforcing some nebulous notion of ‘equality
and diversity and inclusion’ is costly and destructive.
A society is not the same as a company and maybe profit
and wealth aren’t the only metrics, but surely, like any successful enterprise,
a nation should keep on asking, ‘how does this help’? How does it help that one
‘community’ is protected from criticism? How does it help that police forces
seem determined to create and prosecute imaginary crimes under the label of
hate? How does it help to insist that perceptions of gender identity that
border on mental illness are not only normal, but should be promoted relentlessly
among impressionable children?
We can't just keep on doing this.
If we are navigating choppy waters surely steadying the
ship is what is required; not loading it up with ever more unstable elements.
There is a highly visible and apparently growing segment of our society whose
aims are unclear, but who relentlessly demonstrate, sometimes with menaces, for
conflicting changes they can neither define nor safely bring about. Instead of
indulging them we should be clinically examining their negative contributions
to our national efforts and asking, quite firmly, how does this help? Because,
if it doesn’t, it doesn’t belong.
An excellent post, Batsby. You have a rare talent of reducing the complex to first principles.
ReplyDelete