I still have in my possession a treasured postcard from
Hunter Davies in response to a request from Seismic Crew 115 in Libya, for a photo
illustrating his serialised family – specifically, daughter Caitlin - from his Father’s
Day column which ran in Punch magazine for ten years. I hope he gets to read
this blog as, in his reply he accused us of being a bunch of students cooped up
in a junior common room of some provincial polytechnic, rather than the
daredevil oil explorers we really were. Anyway, it’s observational humour
like that which sparked my own interest in writing and I’ve recorded and
commented ever since.
Quite why this should pop into my head when everybody
else is writing about Maria Miller and the absurd situation David Cameron finds
himself in, I have no idea but pop it did and got to me wondering why I write
at all. Let’s face it, fewer than a fraction of a percent of published writers
are able to make any kind of living out of it and the opportunity cost of not
doing something more useful is enormous. I hate the pretentiousness of those
who say “I simply have to write, darlings” because I know I don’t and I’m also
not so precious as to believe that if I just stopped I’d actually be missed.
Such is ‘art’.
I’m being a tad disingenuous, actually, I do know why I’m
writing about writing today. As usual Twitter is a goldmine for inspiration and
a short exchange with a retired English teacher sparked off one of my hobby horses
– the experiment in the 1960s with the Initial Teaching Alphabet which hindered
thousands of infant school pupils in getting to grips with reading at an early
age. Despite some small successes, it was a typical initiative of the
progressives who, no doubt with good intentions, have caused irreparable harm
to all areas of our society. Without reading your education is, to put it bluntly,
fucked.
If you can’t read properly you can’t write and if you can’t
write you can’t reason. You may think you can, but unless you start to put your
thoughts in order it is quite difficult to articulate just what it is you
believe. Of course, the internet is awash with people attempting to do just that,
but the quality control is dire and lunacy is ubiquitous. So, you turn to
established writers – the newspapers print more commentary than they have ever done
before – and discover there is no consensus there, either. It’s rare indeed to
find a news story which is cut and dried and not subject to opinion.
Which brings us back to what you believe. Without
critical reading skills you are going to reject any column which doesn’t feed
your existing prejudices; the most eloquently argued analysis will leave you
cold so you’ll return again and again to the red mastheads and join the
screeching mob of those who let somebody else decide for them just what is right and wrong.
Thus the banshee screams of “Fatchaaa!” passed on from generation to generation
and preventing reasoned discourse. Thus the perpetuation of the myths that, while
you sleep, Tories plot to steal your food and grind up your babies for fertiliser.
I am daily astonished by the things lefties believe. I
can only conclude they can’t read – maybe they are victims of their own educational
experiments? And as for writing, you should grit your teeth and have a go at
Owen Jones and Polly Toynbee and see the astonishing level of conspiracy theory
they feed to their adherents; words can be powerful weapons and dangerous in
the wrong hands. So where do I get off, you ask, thinking that anybody gives a
toss about what I write? I don’t. And anyway, don’t blame me; blame Hunter
Davies.
No comments:
Post a Comment