Much unrest afoot and abroad; the Chinese curse has been
realised and we live in interesting times indeed. The population votes for
Brexit and is decried as uncivilised, racist, ignorant and in a spectacular
inversion of the definition, unpatriotic. (Support for an independent nation
state is now the opposite of patriotism, apparently) Meanwhile, over in Italy,
the EU demonstrates – yet again – that this institution is the antitheses of
democracy, while simultaneously rewriting the general understanding of
democracy to fit their actions. There is a pattern.
Here is another pattern. In the movie A Few Good Men,
Colonel Jessop says, “I have neither the
time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under
the blanket of the very freedom that I provide, then questions the manner in
which I provide it.” This is but a variation of a sentiment often, if
erroneously, attributed to Churchill, that "We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night
to visit violence on those who would harm us." And linked to this is
the idea that you are only free to express dissent because people of whom you
may disapprove have fought and continue to fight for that right.
I confess, I have never taken to the streets in protest.
I have had no need. I have often argued that there is no ‘far right’ to worry
about, as the bedwetters of the huddled leftist masses imagine because those
they fear wish them no harm; we generally pay them no heed at all. But let me
explain: Left and right originally was used to describe the sides in the French
revolution; commoners on the left, aristocrats on the right. Now the aristos
are few, but the peasants have formed two broadly distinct classes – ‘rich’ and
‘poor’ – and a whole class war has evolved around it.
The nominal rich have no need of association; they wield
power and influence commensurate with the depth of their pockets and
willingness to intervene. Often, despite all the propaganda to the contrary,
the well-off have deep social consciences and are a far greater force for good
than the rabble rousers of the ‘lower orders’ will admit. (See how easily the
language of class conflict floats to the surface.) So it is to we lower orders
that the real duties of society fall. On the one side are those of us who work
hard, earn well and pay taxes so that the rest may supplement their perceived penury.
For which playing the game we are called ‘right wing’; we shrug and shoulder
our burden.
On the other side are the aggrieved, the disenchanted who
feel the world has not bestowed its riches upon them, the disenfranchised who
feel their voice is unheard and unheeded. The young, the ignorant, the unlucky
and sometimes – let’s not be coy – the plain idle, who, no matter the real reasons
for their lack of the success they feel is theirs by right, are easily
persuaded by meddlesome minds that they have been wronged. This is the flock,
the constituency, of the left and everybody who disapproves of their cajoling
and bullying ways is labelled ‘far right’ and dismissed as bigots.
The fictional hero James Bond is a killer, a cold-blooded
killer at that, but he’s okay; he’s cool, even. The much-admired SAS has a high
proportion of actual psychopaths in its ranks, but you are happy for them to
mete out summary justice, especially when you don’t have to witness it, or when
you can dress it up in glory. But Tommy Robinson? He may be the very definition
of an ‘Inglourious Basterd’[sic] but your
world is a safer place with him in it. Call him ‘far right, call him a Nazi,
call him a thug. But just realise that you are allowed to call him all this,
allowed to openly despise him, precisely because people like him have stood up to be counted.
Some rough men, doing what they had to do...
And while you are busy spitting your righteous hatred in
his direction, you may want to take a moment to consider that Anjem Choudary is
being released. So while one rough man, who has practised vocal, often clumsy, but peaceful opposition,
is placed in mortal danger by the state (and I don’t give a toss about the
legal technicalities involved, I really don’t) the state (you and I) will spend
millions to protect a man who is directly implicated in the
brutal killing of Lee Rigby and others and who has effectively declared islamic
war against all of us. Are you still sleeping safely in your beds?
Bit of a nitpick, but Bond, as created by Ian Fleming, is not a cold blooded killer. Fleming was writing soon after the war and based on his experiences in the war. Bond is basically a soldier, who sees it as his patriotic duty to serve his country, in whatever way required. A widespread view in those days, for instance the training of the SOE. But he was not unaffected by killing. The Bond of the films is a totally different creature and much more shallow.
ReplyDelete