I sometimes give way to whimsy on a Friday but I just
read this Commentator article and it echoes an accelerating invasive phenomenon
that I have seen at close quarters and always been concerned about. A few years
ago, for entirely practical reasons, I moved to this house in an area you might
describe as just one step up from white trash. It was never particularly nice,
but I've been away for five years and what I see now I have returned makes me
angry; how could it not?
Six of them. Six of the noisy little fuckers playing loudly
in the street and because of their cultural norms, playing loudly in the street
until very late. A group of their male teenage and early-twenties role models
driving noisy quad bikes with poor silencers around and around the streets for
hours on end. I can’t help but feel – given the preponderance of former
industrial waste land in the area - that they could have more fun elsewhere yet
here they are, night after night. And where just five years ago you saw their sisters
and mothers wearing western dress they now resemble tall, sinister, black bin
bags.
While the local Hindus and Sikhs run legitimate businesses
and are generally well respected and accepted, the Muslims display an obvious
and intentional reliance on benefits and cash-in-hand working and breeding for
benefits and an utter refusal to integrate with other faiths and sensibilities.
Nationally they parade an agenda which they no longer feel the need to hide;
nothing less than to dominate the entire world.
It’s not offensive to tell the simple, observable truth. Islam
is not beautiful as many of its supporters claim, it is ugly and sordid and primitive
and wrong. And it is utterly alien to western civilisation. There is not a
single overtly Islamic country I can think of which is not held together by
force and fear. I wonder that more anti-Islamic activity is not reported but
then I’ve also seen how enthusiastically governments and their police have prosecuted
‘hate crimes’. A hate crime is anything which is seen as a threat to the
left-liberal doormat policy of lying down and being trampled to death.
Surely there can be no more hateful a crime than to use a
country’s generosity as a tool of invasion? To use a country’s tolerant nature
against it. To wage war with wombs. We simply must not stand by and be
conquered by birth rates. Yet we will because nobody dare lift a finger to
prevent it. The only way that will happen is going to be atrocious. I can only
thank anything but Allah that I will probably die before the real horror and bloodshed
starts.
Mein Koranf
Reminds me of Winston Churchill...
ReplyDelete“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.
A degraded sensualist deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome …”
Sir Winston Churchill; Source: The River War, first edition, Vol II, pages 248-250 London
re my tweet: We are all the same! Perhaps too simplifies it. As a manc I sympathise. Where I was raised is unrecognisable. Very sad. But I was raised to accept the changes and respect them. It's not the ppl it's how they were raised. And clearly without respect for our culture or creeds. Again very sad. But with a government who clearly thinks we should all simply get along and get on with it, there is no chance! My sons are not nearly so forgiving as I and I do truly fret for them, their families, and their future..
ReplyDeleteSociety relies on a certain give and take, but we appear to arrived now at a give and take we never imagined. Worse of all, the giving we give and the taking our bearded friends take (I am not including the females because mostly theirs is not a happy lot) doesn't make us happy and it certainly doesn't seem to please them.
ReplyDeleteBut it is never the big things that get you; it is the little things in life that wear away any hope of cohesion so enthusiastically dreamed up by politicians who imagine a social world far removed from what most of us see and encounter on the streets of many of our towns. The gap between the west and the muslim way of life grows daily, little by little in terms of dress and language and attitude and separation. Every concession made for 'what they want' is followed by the tribes wanting a little more.
Small things like the houses near me: you know it is a muslim house because it is been overextended with the roof dotted with skylights, the front garden paved over for taxis to park, the kitchen windows wide open and the perpetual smell of curry, and above all everything behind high walls and spiked gates.
This alone is the signal they are separate from the rest of us. The gardens of non-mulsims usually have low walls, few gates and if they are there they are left open, not closed tight. The non-muslim approach is to be open and inviting. The muslim approach is to build high walls and imposing gates.
It may be to keep their women inside; as a religion islam has a remarkably primitive way of regarding their females. The walls and gates may be to however to make a very public statement that they are not part of us, and perhaps never will be.
Paki railings. That what I call them.
Delete