Put aside your opinions as to what percentage of the
blame can be borne personally by Tony Blair for the current crisis in Iraq –
and Ed Miliband might want to note that unlike the cost-of-living campaign this
really IS a crisis – and consider that Mad Tony is almost certainly correct in his assertion that only
extreme force could have any real impact on ISIS. As for the jihadists
themselves they are treading a well-worn and brutal path, in keeping with
primitive warrior sects throughout the ages.
It is rumoured that after taking Samarkand, eight hundred
years ago, Genghis Khan ordered a pyramid be erected in his honour constructed entirely
from the severed heads of conquered civilians, including children. In the
fifteenth century, Vlad III, Prince of Wallachia of the House of
Drăculești, became most famous for the forests of impaled victims he left as a
reminder to those who dared challenge him. Idi Amin brutally massacred anywhere
between 100,000 and half a million of his own citizens, the corruption and
chaos of his regime being largely responsible for the ultimately unknowable final
death toll.
Whether through madness or cold calculation people like
this are to be excoriated and condemned, but most of all they should be feared precisely
because they do not fear us. Having left our own brutal, bloodthirsty past far
behind, opting for an ‘all must come home’ model of warfare, wherever possible fought
at arm’s length and through oily back room diplomacy, ISIS are correct in their
assessment that by the time we do anything it will be far too late. And far too feeble.
Satellite surveillance, drone strikes, sanctions… against
a ruthless and fearless enemy that glories in killing – close up, bloody
killing - we are at a disadvantage so profound we might be better to just lay
down our arms altogether and employ our superior technology instead on doing our
best to identify the dead and dying whose names will otherwise be lost to
history. Is this where the west ends up, as accountants and scorekeepers for a
world ruled by a profoundly brutal medievalism?
Ignoring the dangers of unchecked islam for so many years
has put the jihadists in the driving seat – region after region has fallen to
the extremists and western observers have been fooled by the lying mask of ‘moderate
islam’. There is no such thing, or else if there is, where ARE the noisy demonstrations
calling for the kaffir NOT to be beheaded? Where are the burning korans and the
stamping into the dirt of islamic flags? Western civilisation has been busy
this half-century, burning its own flag… and taking its eye off the prize it
created. We have already given our countries away and now we wring our hands in
despair as our values are looted, desecrated and burned in front of our eyes.
Yesterday I heard of talks designed to limit Iran’s access to
nuclear weapons. The very thought should chill all our bones because unlike in the
civilised world – in which Iran once played a part before the rule of the Ayatollahs
– nuclear missiles would not be used, as they have been for decades, as a deterrent.
They would be tactical weapons of holy fury to be unleashed on a west whose
main crime is to be ashamed of its own genuine moral superiority.
The talk in the west is about the options open to us to
do… to do what? What do we hope to achieve? To intervene or not to intervene?
To fight or to merely mop up the blood stains? But discussions about the choices
open to us are mostly futile; when the time comes, islam will give us no
choices.
No comments:
Post a Comment