There’s an abnormally strong whiff of envious malcontent
in the air and the usual non-sequiturs are doing the rounds:
Boo hoo: the Chinese president rides around London in a
golden carriage – why do we tolerate that while there are homeless people in
those streets?
Boo hoo: look at that lavishness of that state banquet –
how dare people dine like that while some people are nearly starving?
Boo hoo: even though we have no idea what the price of
energy will be in the future, how dare the ‘cruel Tory government’ take such
expensive steps to secure our fuel needs for the next fifty years? (The absurd counter
proposal is that they should invest that money in the entirely uncertain output
from wind farms, whose figures are rigged and which make rich landowners
richer.)
Meanwhile, in many parts of the world people literally
die from starvation, not from going two days without a KFC bargain bucket.
Homes by the thousand are swept away by floods and landslides and tsunamis and
earthquakes in countries whose governments are powerless to help. Despotic
rulers disappear their detractors and whole populations are driven to desperate
measures to escape wholesale slaughter. And if you ever see a satellite picture
of the earth at night, only the wealthy margins of the populated world have any
electricity at all.
But - boo hoo - 2.25 million Londoners are ‘living inpoverty’. Oh, do fuck off; the numbers are meaningless, our measure
of poverty is absurd, but underlying it all is a common thread – the cloth of
gold called entitlement. From where came the notion that everybody deserves
so much? Nobody owes you a living. Nobody even owes you life. But you’re here
now and if you spend it all waiting for somebody else to fend for you, you will
die disappointed. But if you are fortunate enough to possess all your limbs and
your faculties, you might want to consider the pecking order for aid while you’re
waiting...
The national cake is only as big as we can bake it – no,
Labour, borrowing is not free money, you still have to pay for it. So after
covering the costs of roads, schools, hospitals, police, defences, etc whatever
is left is all there is to go round. Where do you put yourself on a scale of leukemia
sufferer to multiple amputee? Is your home an exposed park bench or a cosy
squat? Does an adult with a lifelong mental age of four deserve more help than a
life’s-end Alzheimer’s sufferer? Do you think of the children or the cancer
ward when you give to charity? Is your new hip more important than her new
lungs? Who gets the single donor heart when four are needed?
Look deeper and you can go on and on and on – everybody wants
a piece of that last slice of cake – in comparison, how great is your need?
Nobody in Britain actually starves except by the direct neglect of others. If
you’re concerned about feeding you eleven children did you stop to consider for
one moment who was going to have to go without so that you could have what you
wanted? What unique and debilitating condition do you possess that makes you so
much more deserving than others? Just how much of other people’s money do you
think you should have.
Thanks very much... I'll have two quid.
So, it’s a shame for the steel workers and homelessness
is a national shame and dear oh dear the bloated NHS still has only days to
live. But if you can’t see that we must live within our means and that by lavishly
welcoming potential contributors to our national bake off we are spending
millions to gain billions your argument for the spending to come your way is
somewhat short on logic. My suggestion? Unless you absolutely rely on others
for your every living need, the first place you should look for help is in the
mirror.
Here, here wellbsaid
ReplyDeleteHere, here wellbsaid
ReplyDelete