I can see why supporters of the Labour Party are concerned
about the level of funding for mental health issues. I’m concerned about the
level of self-delusion they exhibit and I only hope they can keep it together
until 8th June because the fallout is going to be glorious. It’s
supposed to be wrong to gloat but, come on, have you heard the stuff they
believe in? I know that a positive attitude can be an advantage, but the
Corbynistas positively believe they’re onto something. Why? Because when they
told a bunch of students in Labour Central – Bradfordistan – that they would
abolish tuition fees, the crowd went wild.
But away from the echo chamber of like-minded simpletons,
most people are ambivalent about political colour, wanting only to be free to
get on with their lives with the minimum of interference from authority. They
are generally tolerant and hope that their neighbours return the sentiment.
Most people don’t want to be a burden. They also don’t want to pay to look
after other burdens, but will happily let themselves be moderately taxed to
support a generally benevolent society. Most people have no absolute political
allegiance and are often vague about which party best fits their views
A few people are sadists; this is not defined by their
political allegiance. A few people are mentally deranged; this is not defined
by their political allegiance. Some people are unwilling to confront uncomfortable
truths about themselves; this is not defined by their political allegiance. Some
people are saints; this is not defined by their political allegiance. And so
on; who you are is not defined by your politics but by how you live your life.
There is, however, a strong correlation between being self-reliant and voting
Conservative and being dependent on others and voting Labour.
The perennial problem with the welfare state is the issue
of who deserves help and who pays for it. This used to be simpler than it is
now and when we inhabited a world in which morals were pretty uniform – we knew
who the goodies and the baddies were, we knew how decent humans behaved. Yes
there were those who fell through the cracks, but on the whole most of us
realised that self-reliance was the ‘better’ way and relying on the charity of
others was a last resort. But those needs and entitlements have been blurred
now with so many defined as in some kind of need and welfare dressed up as tax credits
which exceed the tax paid in the first place.
Labour wants to expand the welfare state. The
Conservatives know this is not possible at current productivity levels. Labour
insists, against the clear opinion of pretty much every non-idealised
commentator, that it can raise the money. This is the principle battleground that
they have chosen for the election. It’s okay repeating guff about a fairer
society, social justice, compassion and decency, but the fact remains that
somebody, all of us, have to dig into our pockets to cover their ‘fully costed’
manifesto. It seems that Labour has brought an expired credit card to a cash
fight.
Maybe I would vot Labour if they paid me enough...
ReplyDelete