When Gordon Brown made his famous ‘no more boom and bust’
declaration he was falling prey to the mistaken belief that he had the supernatural
ability to curb such cycles. This is a very common affliction in those with some
power; soon enough they begin to believe that the gerrymandered process which
put them in place conferred both wisdom and efficacy beyond
mere human expertise. It is a conceit, a folly, often followed by a fall. Those
whom the gods wish to destroy they first make mad; the madness being a form of megalomania.
It has often been said that economic forecasting was
invented primarily to make astrology look credible. But the economy usually
defies most predictions, and the commentariat choose to ignore the majority of
incorrect forecasts. Although economies can be pushed and persuaded, they are
ultimately the summation of many much smaller decisions made by those who
contribute to it. If enough people decide to stop buying and start saving the
flow of money is redirected in ways that may be broadly modelled but cannot be
entirely foreseen. Much economic lore is not so much soothsaying as just being
wise, and selective with the data, after the event.
Although governments may be able to do some small somethings,
their powers are poor in the face of panic. Whatever you do, don’t tell people there
is going to be a shortage of fuel, or toilet paper… or money. You may think you
are being honest and precautionary, but watch the herd stampede us right into the
crisis you warned of. And talking of crisis, just exactly how many crises do we
need at any one time and how will the reactions to them interact and intersect?
The truth is nobody knows, and it is impossible to plan for outcomes which
nobody can accurately predict.
But humans do like a good story, which is why the mongers
of doom and conspiracy are currently yet more encouraged to believe that all
this shit is happening by design, rather than through simple, unemotive chaos. Responding
to a tweet about climate change and net zero, I invoked Hanlon’s Razor: “Never
ascribe to malice that which can more readily be explained by incompetence”. In
response I was scolded for being a blind fool, then blocked, as is often the way
with those who desperately need to stick to the story they believe.
It turns out that incompetence has an economy all its own
whereby the cumulative effects of lots of tiny blunders takes on the appearance
of intent. Thus, just as climate alarmists will ascribe every weather event,
wherever it is, whatever the seasonal norms, as more certain proof of their thesis,
it is easily possible to assemble all the little cock-ups and rearrange that random
jigsaw puzzle to create a picture entitle ‘intent’.
Nobody involved in rolling out 5G cares one hoot about Covid.
Doctors and epidemiologists are sharply focused on their mission without any
regard for the ravings of Klaus Schwab. The Chinese have colluded with nobody
to bring about Net-Zero ambitions in the trigger-happy, activist-responsive
governments of the west, and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is all about Russia and
nothing to do with The UK’s inflation rate.
Yes, there will be a rubbing of shoulders between all of these
things at times, and there may even be brief collusions or coalitions aimed at
solving, or exacerbating, one problem or other but the notion of a team of humans
clever enough to bring any of this about by deliberate intent is something of a
stretch. The intersection of a million little incompetencies may occasionally give
the appearance of a vaguely definable direction of travel, but look again a few
days later and you’ll see it was just the particulates from an explosion
briefly flying in formation before plummeting back to earth.
We do love a pattern, we Earthlings, but sometimes the creative effort of finding a pattern in a mess of erratic, non-aligned events of the age is not worth the candle. Economies are the result of many individual decisions, influenced by many different motives, which often assumes the guise of deliberate planning. Stupidity is much the same; a million irrational, fact-free beliefs can look, at times, like a plot. And it takes a special kind of stupid to join those dots.
One is generally not disappointed to prefer cock-up to conspiracy in the field of explanation.
ReplyDelete