In Davos, a bunch of jokers who believe, or at least
proclaim, that they represent the populations of the First World are meeting to
discuss… what, exactly? What conclusions have they pre-planned to arrive at and
what decisions will be made which will affect us all, yet have no basis in anything
remotely linked to democracy? In fact how many of the world’s ‘leading’
countries can even lay claim to the dubious distinction of being truly democratic?
Following the current LibDem determination to tear
themselves apart over the Lord Rennard debacle, former leader Paddy ‘PantsDown’
Ashdown, without a hint of irony, spoke about how ‘the people’ MUST conform to
the ‘new standards’ of morality and acceptable behaviour. The people yes, but
obviously not the politicians who routinely behave in ways that reveal their susceptibility
to the most base of human frailties – greed and lust feature high on an MP’s CV.
Surely people in public office should be held to higher standards first?
Labour talk the talk about being the party of the working
class… or is it the middle class now? They talk tough on welfare and making work…
er work, yet they oppose every measure the coalition has introduced in order to
do just that. But this self-proclaimed Party of the People is so far removed
from those same people as to be indistinguishable from any other mob in
Westminster. While some of its lowly and increasingly elderly back benchers are
grounded in the honourable Labour Movement, the glorious leaders have eyes only
for power and the prizes power brings – an invitation to Davos, perhaps?
Meanwhile the Conservatives, long supporters of the
wealth producers, seek to remain firmly in the wealth confiscating European
Union, approval to join which has never been asked of the British people. Even
now, reminiscent of the worst kind of conjuring trick, they hope to fool the people
into believing a referendum will both be offered and fought on a level field, while
the fifth ace is clumsily sticking out of their sleeve. David Cameron must
barely be able to contain his glee at the charade of the private members bill,
currently being timed out by the supposed opposition tabling a litany of amendments
whose transparently flimsy nature oversteps the border of contempt.
What not one of the established parties has is a valid
and representative view of the bulk of the people they seek to control. In fact
what most people want from government is not interference in the minutiae of
their every waking moment, but the freedom to get on and follow their own
paths. The last thing happy people living fulfilling lives are interested in is
politics. As more and more freedoms are curtailed and behaviours proscribed,
even “the government must do something” is more an expression of impotent frustration
than any genuine desire for more top-down interference.
Left to their own devices most of the population will
sort themselves out. The only state involvement they need or want is light
touch regulation and a bit of law and order. But the group that actively need
government are the only ones they tend to squabble over. What a shame then that
those people most reliant on the state understand and trust authority about as
much as they understand and trust joined-up meat. All they want is bland,
Turkey-Twizzler dole-dispensers who will maintain their lifestyles regardless
of what it costs everybody else.
On all sides the out-of-touch ‘liberal’ types rail
against ‘demonisation’ of those wholly on benefits and say to all who listen
that they want nothing more than to be in work, that they need our sympathy and
support to become productive members of society. But ask anybody who lives on a
large council estate and they will point out the criminals, the idle, the
dossers and those who pop out sprogs as if they didn’t know how to stop it. The only thing they want is to be left alone with their benefits.
Which way to the conference?
So, while the political classes squabble over the small
number of people who need their charity but won’t vote, the largely
uncomplaining majority work on, wondering just when a politician, any
politician, will say a single thing to suggest that they understand. When Davos
concludes that what the world needs now is love, sweet love, more wind turbines
and more EU-style ‘democracy’ it might be helpful to remember that politicians
on the whole represent nobody but themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment