Peter Sutcliffe, the Yorkshire Ripper, is apparently well
enough to be moved back to prison after thirty years in Broadmoor. Paranoid schizophrenia,
apparently. Meanwhile Ian Brady remains as insane as ever, banged up in
Ashworth. What has always puzzled me, however, is why we even need to know
this. They are gone from the world and unless our intent is simple revenge it
would have been better for pretty much everybody if they had been released
early... into the hereafter. There are no doubts over their convictions, they
leave no dependents, nobody would mourn them. Why are they even still alive?
Have we learned anything new about criminality from them?
Or did we always understand that the human race can create aberrant and
unrepentant monsters? The only way to stop people like this from continuing with
their own malevolence is to contain them. Why do they want to send Sutcliffe
back to prison? Because it costs six times as much to keep him in a psychiatric
unit. Guess how much it would cost to keep him in a coffin? Containment,
prevention... cure.
Of course, criminal psychologists love a celebrity
nutjob; the book they get out of studying them could make their professional name.
But why would you want to become feted for an in-depth and close-up study of such
depravity? Maybe such people share some of the same character traits as their
subjects – a desire for attention, a detachment from mainstream humanity, an
unhealthy preoccupation with deviation? Psychopaths are known for their ability
to manipulate their prey, even to gain their trust before slaughtering them. I
wonder if Jeremy Corbyn understands this when he suggests ISIS can be
negotiated with.
Like the Sutcliffes, the Hindleys, the Bradys and others,
the criminally insane pull the wool over the eyes of do-gooders, appeasers and
those who just want to teach the world to sing. Maybe this is why people like
Jeremy Corbyn believe, as few really believe, there can be a peaceful resolution
to the challenges posed by the Middle East’s millennia-long mass psychosis. If islam
is the murderous basket case it needs to be excluded from influence in the sane
world, not consulted as to how best to meet its appetites.
We need to talk...
We deny children, the demented and those who have
demonstrated they don’t have the mental capacity, the making of decisions and
control over their affairs because we rationally judge that no good can come of
it. And yet we’re letting our uncertainly-equipped Lower House debate the ‘treatment’
for a serial killing machine operating in plain sight. Maybe they will get a
book out of it? Maybe this is he proof, if more proof were needed, that the lunatics really are running
the asylum.
No comments:
Post a Comment