The sights, sounds, tastes and norms of alien cultures
formed the periodic backdrop to three years of my life in my early twenties
before I returned to the familiar and settled down for a while back in the UK.
I don’t know why I bothered. The familiar is now not familiar and what was
exotic in foreign climes is just plain out of place in Blighty. Men in drab
dresses walk down our streets and invisible women clad in dark shrouds
congregate outside school gates. Signs are written in a multitude of foreign
scripts and our policemen have to be oh-so sensitive, so as not to unduly
offend those they arrest.
Perhaps we need some before and after photographs –
because you’ve all forgotten (if you ever knew) what it used to be like. The
end game of the multicultural propagandists is that your children will never
know what being British ever meant. And for those who still have faint memories
it’s the reverse of the emperor’s new clothes trick; as if you just don’t want to
see what is happening right in front of your nose.
Janet Daley wrote recently in the Telegraph about press
freedoms and in particular the way in which the BBC is complicit in presenting
an unwaveringly positive portrayal of Britain the way they want to see it. She writes “BBC news output is specifically designed to
counter what it sees as ignorance and popular prejudices.” And on the hated ‘right-wing
press’: “The BBC approach to news is aimed precisely at those people who read
the papers that are hated by its staff. It is intended to offer an alternative
vision of reality in which immigration is not a threat to anyone, patriotism is
a joke, religious belief (as opposed to ethnic identity) is not taken
seriously, conflicting cultural values never create social problems and
government spending is inherently virtuous.”
And it’s not just the news. The BBC’s autumn soft crime
drama ‘By Any Means’ seems to be predicated on the populist myth that the middle
classes are vaguely shady, blithely evade justice and only a dedicated crack
squad operating outside the law can bring them to book. Last week’s episode centred
around a corrupt, caricature-Tory property developer with connections in
government, getting away, literally, with murder. This week the couple under investigation were obvious
dopplegangers for a well-known ex-Tory couple, engaged in a caper to cynically rip off a charity
This is the nation’s state broadcaster’s standard cipher for
Conservatives, the middle classes, business owners; anybody in fact who makes
a net contribution to life in the UK. In contrast their depiction of the lower
paid, working or not, is unwaveringly positive, their dabbling in black markets
seen as either necessary, unavoidable or simply high jinks, Jack-the-lad antics
to brighten up the place.
I can hardly bear to listen to young people any more with
their Jafaican patois and their risible groupthink assertions of the opinions
of some of their brainwashed teachers. (And since when did tutors start calling
their charges ‘mate’? Watch any episode of ‘Educating Yorkshire’.) Yet many susceptible
parents are now instructed by their semi-literate offspring that their views of
the world are wrong and that acceptance of deliberate and harmful social
engineering without question is right.
A spokesman for god-knows-what on The Daily Politics this
week repeated the on-message assertion that immigrants are a net benefit; that
is they pay more in tax than they take out in benefits. But this is a classic
use of numbers to affirm a lie – the net figure, even if it is actually true,
hides the real costs to Britain on a one-by-one basis. Take this as an example:
A foreign worker brings his wife and two kids here, where
he gets a job on £30k a year and thus pays total deductions of around £6,800 for
the 2013-14 tax year. Will he get tax credits? Or housing and child benefit? I
don’t know, so I’ll assume he doesn’t. Given that the NHS alone costs about
£3,600 a year for every working person in Britain (based on £109bn last year, with
around 30 million workers) he is not even paying his way for the kids, let
alone a family of four. Factor in the cost of schools, roads, defence and the family
on benefits that this family is displacing and it’s clear the numbers just don’t
add up. Yet all immigration is still always good
immigration.
Traditional Britain - according to the BBC
We already cannot afford this economic, cultural and social illiteracy and it
is only going to get worse. But it doesn't matter; superstate EU puppet
handlers will simply rob Peter to pay Paul then alter the facts to suit whatever
disjointed agenda is the cause du jour. While the Winstons are busy ‘adjusting’
our history they may as well alter old song lyrics too. Remember the rousingTom
Robinson classic Motorway, from the nineteen seventies? Let’s all sing together
“Two, four, six, eight – manipulate!”
I very much mourn the passing of what once was. And nor do I see it through rose-tinted spectacles as many would and do suggest. Times were harsh, desperately harsh frequently; but we knew a glorified happiness and form of freedom that no longer exists. Most of what passes for happiness/freedom these days, comes out of a pill, or a bottle, or is seen on tv, whatever, whatever amen. #justsaying
ReplyDeleteThat was bloody brilliant.
ReplyDeleteThe latest buzz phrase is just to prefix any figures with 'but in real terms', and then it makes it all positive for very stupid people. Watch me transform this...
Roma Pavlakova earns £30,000 per annum, pays £6,800 in tax, and his family costs the taxpayer £12,000, but in real terms, they contribute to overall GDP, reduce our levels of government borrowing, and bring cultural diversity to local communities.
Easy!
Let's see how many times it crops up on BBC's Question Time programme, if you can bear it.
Excellent stuff! I think they should make me the entire Question Time audience... I have a few questions here... *rolls out wallpaper* We may be some time!
Delete"immigrants are a net benefit"
ReplyDeleteWhat a sadly disillusioned man.