A caller to LBC this afternoon thought it mighty clever
of Call-me-Dave to stuff the Lords with cronies and donors, thus leading to a
grass-roots socialist backlash and the near certainty of Labour ending up with
2020 General Election-losing Jeremy Corbyn for Glorious Leader. At first I
thought, hey, cunning plan, but then I remembered who I was dealing with. While
Labour hasn’t a coherent thought among the lot of them, the current crop of
pseudo-Conservatives are hardly joined-up government personified. Apart from
lucking out on the economy I struggle to recall a single bit of brilliant policy
that has led to the desired outcomes.
But isn’t that what the Lords are there for? To volley
back to the Commons policy on which the stitching has come undone. Or to toss
into the trash that which should never have made it off the lower house’s
cutting room floor. When the ermined were the real deal it was in an age when
they took it as a sacred trust to look after the country for posterity. A good
Squire knows it is in his own interests to keep the peasants fed and happy
enough at least not to revolt. And while there were – with absolutely no doubt –
devilish dealings and underhand pacts made for the enrichment of the landed
class the peasantry wouldn’t have known what to do with wealth anyway.
I mean, look at them; richer than at any time in history,
all they seem to do is demand more for less in an open show of ignorance that
would embarrass anybody with the feeblest cerebral pulse. And it’s a positive
feedback loop – this is rarely a good thing, you non-logicians out there –
whereby the masses vote for the parties whose lies they prefer, who then in
turn pack the red benches with peers who won’t oppose them. And still the leeching goes on (doesn’t it ‘Lord Moat’?) but that’s okay because now both ends are hammering the middle.
From the political left comes the cry “Reform the Lords!”
by which they mean, “Make them agree with us!” But oh how quickly those
principles slip away, Lord Prescott, when the call comes from above? There really
is no sensible answer. Hereditary succession is rejected because of the class
war which has been raging a century or more now. An appointed peerage is a
clear no-go as the numbers approach a thousand ennobled stooges who proceed
with partisan agendas while taking their £300-a-day to snooze on the
plush leather. And an elected upper chamber is a ludicrous nonsense which will
simply bring whichever electoral system is used for selection into disrepute.
Lord Filthy Rich
So, what’s it to be? I say we turn the House of Lords
into a retirement club for those whose days of political ne’er-do-welling are
over. Instead of us paying them to attend we maintain the building as a
national treasure, but they cover the running costs and act as tour guides and
tea room staff for bemused foreign visitors. But, you ask, what of the legislative
safety valve? What of the control over runaway governments? What of the checks
and balances? To which my response is, ask the unelected masters in Brussels;
they’re in charge now.
No comments:
Post a Comment