I’ve never unequivocally supported unregulated ‘free
market capitalism’. That can only end one way, probably with corporate militias
as envisioned in the worst of the 1970s and 80s apocalyptic vision movies such
as Rollerball. But full socialism offers no better; a life of dreary mediocrity for all but party officials.
Len McClusky was on Radio 4 yesterday, talking about how Corbyn offers hope to
end ‘the austerity which is crippling this country’. Really? Not giving away
any more free stuff than we can afford is crippling? When, under socialism,
your productivity declines and there is simply not enough to go around, who do
you decide to save?
The left in Britain has never had a coherent alternative
to the actually very successful soft socialism the Conservative Party reside
over. The continuing sitcom that is Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour continued over the
weekend with both Emily Thornberry and Jezzer himself appearing all over the media
to ‘explain’ Labour’s defence review. The message seemed to be, “It’s a review –
we don’t know what the outcome will be” but one thing (almost) decided, by
Emily & Jezz, if not by the party was no to nukes. What about the
submarines, asked the meeja? We could have the bombers without Trident... or Trident
without being equipped with nuclear warheads. Well, I suppose we already have
aircraft carriers without aircraft, so why not?
What next? Guns without bullets? Troops without guns? A
flag without a nationality? Continuing the anti-austerity, save the planet, do
no harm agenda we could re-open the mines but not burn coal, build more nuclear
power stations but never run them. Saving yet more money, how about having a
comprehensive national transport policy but build no roads, or railways? Why
not hospitals without doctors, schools without teachers? (Actually, that’s
quite a good idea – keep that in.) When you are in opposition you can be
creative; it’s easy to have policy without purpose if you’re never going to be
in a position to enable it. Labour; a political party but with no intention of
ever again being elected – the unilateral disarmament of the workers’ party.
The Labour Party prefers wife-beating to nukes.
So, capitalism gives us stuff but only lets you have it
if you earn it. There is no such thing as ‘equality’ in capitalism; it’s winner
takes all. On the other hand, Corbynism produces nothing but shares it out equitably.
There has to be another way, a third way if you will. Whoops, wasn’t that Tony
Blair’s big thing? But seriously the supposed third way is what we’ve practiced
in Britain for a very long time. ‘From each’ and ‘to each’... up to a point.
And austerity is simply the latest name given to the necessary balancing of the
books. Corbyn is against that balance, but it’s okay – if we can have Trident
without the nukes, I’m sure he can rustle up an economic policy without the
money.
Can we have politics without the politicians now that would be great. Actually that is not as implausible as it sounds direct representation would do that but then we would have to do away with those who would be doing the direct representing the general public until they become less stupid. Like we we can only do without all the things Corbyn wants us to when humans not only act less stupidly but also less selfishly and inhumanly in fact when humans stop acting like humans. We have the answer to that as well. AI. Once AI becomes a reality and machines look after our every needs and do all our thinking for us then humans will not act at all.
ReplyDelete