Listen to
the outrage which is still flying round; in the minds of some of our more
deranged commentators, the prime Minister chose to have full-on sex with a dead
animal and thus prove he is unfit to hold office. I expect many a freemason, or
similarly secretive society member, is keeping extremely schtum right now,
recalling the bizarre rituals of acceptance they have undergone. But let’s get
a sense of proportion about it. Embarrassingly popping your flaccid member into
a fold of dead meat for a few seconds in front of a baying crowd of other young initiates is hardly the same
as eagerly thrusting your engorged, excited penis repeatedly into the orifice that
another human being shits through, is it?
Yet the
second act is deemed entirely normal indeed, a lifestyle choice; no, not a
choice but a biological imperative for some. Something that was once seen as so aberrant
as to be illegal for centuries has not only become accepted, but approved and –
to judge by the reaction in some quarters – will become practically compulsory
one day. Once again persistent lobbying has changed the way society thinks and
it is only a matter of time before any dissenters die out. In the odd way that
humans have of adopting fads, a recent report suggested that a very large
percentage of young people are now minded to give homosexuality a go. The
cultural Marxists
must be overjoyed.
The
normalisation of the not-so-normal is an ever-present theme; once upon a
time the English wouldn’t dream of eating brioche yet now the supermarkets are
full of such foreign fripperies.On a
lighter note, in the USA a paedophile has written an essay to the American
public asking not to be judged harshly for an appetite he cannot change but
manages to control. His plea reads much like the anguished petitions of gays in
former years; Alan Turing was driven to suicide over the way his ‘condition’
was treated yet society now feels shame and a need to make amends. Surely it can’t
be impossible for society to learn to differentiate between those who control
their urges and criminals who act on them. Will it go from disgusting to ‘in
the privacy of their own home’ to being regularly flaunted in public? I guess
the real test will be, how long before an out-but-not-proud paedophile will be
deemed an acceptable babysitter?
Of course
there is always the option to have a dual morality, something which seems to
come naturally to those in positions of power. In the devout muslim world, for
instance, homosexuality is still a crime punishable by extreme gravity, yet it
is far from uncommon for some of that wider community to keep boy sex-slaves whose sole purpose is to
be bestially buggered at the whim of the master. Presumably the justification
is that if your slave is not given full human status it is not seen as homosexuality to
fuck him; and what better way to perpetuate the practice than to continue the
cycle of abuse until they eventually come to like it?
Normal - it's not what you're thinking.
What will
we next be expected to accept? Those who have won concessions for tastes once
considered abhorrent have done so by persistence, by not being cowed by a
hostile majority and look how we have eventually accepted their way of
thinking. So it should come as no surprise that flying in the face of public
opinion and national sovereignty the EU has once again ignored the protests and
simply decided that we will accept into our midst hundreds of thousands of
people who don’t possess the western mindset to be coerced and persuaded into
forgiveness and acceptance. A un-democratic regime forcing unwanted change on
its demoralised people? What could possibly go wrong?
