The use of hashtags, bringing metadata into common
currency, is a curious phenomenon and prone to blunder. The latest trending tag
#ThankYouEd is a classic example; started by the
garment-rending children of the left to be competitive in their bereavement,
but swiftly hijacked by others to praise Ed’s ineptitude in handing the keys to
Number Ten back to the man best able to use the office. For the eternal irony
of the mewling left, praising Ed as a saviour come to deliver them from evil itself, is that
the greater good is served by a Conservative approach to almost everything. And
while bile and hatred comes naturally to the caring parties, adherents of the
nasty party are more likely to just find their cringing highly amusing. Thus Ed
is thanked for his valiant efforts in putting the right man at the helm. (Of course, it is all the fault of Margaret Thatcher,
still, even though this time it’s ding-dong the witch is Ed.)
The thinly-disguised communist Giles Fraser writes in the
Guardian “Right now I feel ashamed to be
English. Ashamed to belong to a country that has clearly identified itself as
insular, self-absorbed and apparently caring so little for the most vulnerable
people among us. … Maybe that’s why the pollsters got it so badly wrong: we are
not so much a nation of shy voters as of ashamed voters, people who want to
present to the nice polling man as socially inclusive, but who, in the privacy of
the booth, tick the box of our own self-interest.”
And the child-commentator Owen Jones wrote “There will be a big debate now over the
future of the Labour party, and what the left does next. This country
desperately needs a politics of hope that answers people’s everyday problems on
living standards, job security, housing, public services and the future of
their children… What is needed is a movement rooted in the lives of
working-class people and their communities. The future of millions of people
depends on it.“
I’m tempted to taunt with cries of diddums and in my
weaker moments I confess I’m not above a bit of gloating, but the problem is self-evident; once again the
privileged left-wingers just can’t see what is in front of everybody’s else’s
eyes. Much the same thing happened in Maggie’s day as Kinnock’s goons just failed
to understand the motives of the ordinary working man. Labour were shocked by
how many ordinary workers voted for Tories, then and now. But why wouldn’t
they? What most seek is a steady job, a home, a family life and as little government
intervention by way of taxes and rules as possible; in other words, core Conservative
principles.
Even in the heady days of union strength though, that apparent
solidarity was driven by a desire for collective power spurred on by the thought
of individual gain, but it was heavily enforced by sanctions. Ask any strike-breaker
tarred with the tag of ‘scab’ and he will explain how 'caring' leftist ideologies are
made to function. If the only effective means by which you can order society is
through coercive legislation – race laws, hate crimes, restriction of speech,
enforced multiculturalism skewed by privileges for the few, etc, etc - I’d
suggest you look a lot more like fascists than do the Tories.
What we need are nice uniforms...
Meanwhile, as the Blue Team roll up their sleeves and take
up, unfettered, where they left off, Labour and the rest of the raggle-taggle left will fire
up their well-oiled electoral thinking engine and without any meaningful consultation
with those they seek to represent they will convene insider focus groups, gather
in Marxist study meetings and come up with some really pithy slogans. You just
see if they don’t
Nice one (again)!
ReplyDeleteI wish I'd said that!
ReplyDelete@ James Clark; very nice ;) !
ReplyDeleteh/t JNW Whistler