It’s been a quiet few weeks from the pint-sized poison
dwarf of Parliament but suddenly, up he pops and rants that he will “fight
with every breath in my body” to prevent the government from carrying out
the expressed will of the electorate And ‘Spreadsheet Phil’ Hammond has – by a
feat of uncanny synchronicity- crept out of his crypt to pen an op-ed in The
Times in which he says again that ‘the PM has no mandate for a no deal
Brexit.’ So here we go again for round four-hundred and thirty-four (or
thereabouts) of Project Fear, this time with added loathing.
But look, this ‘deal’ was ever an illusion and as has
been pointed out tirelessly by those of us who voted to leave, the Withdrawal
Agreement isn’t even a deal. The EU has made it clear that no deal is on offer except the invitation to surrender all negotiating leverage and meekly discuss
terms of our effectively handing back sovereignty to Brussels. Because, in order
to have any access to any supposed benefits of the single market, we would have
to accept free movement, legislative oversight, etc, etc, all of which is
exactly what we voted to leave.
And yes, sovereignty was the principle issue. Immigration
and border control figured heavily in the campaigns because the power to set
our own policy in these areas is fundamental to national sovereignty, but even
that ambition was hijacked by our own slimy, sleazy swamp-dwellers. Simple sovereignty
soon became ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty’ and as quickly as the decision had been
contracted out to the voters, it was seized back by those who were the problem in
the first place. Parliament has shown its hand so clearly it is a wonder the
gates have yet to be stormed.
Formerly, the EU was seen as the identifiable enemy of
our freedoms; the unaccountable technocrats deeply in thrall to an ideology
that was ‘of Europe’, maybe, but not of many European nations, especially not
the British. But the question of the referendum was also about control and the
need for the people of any country to feel they were being heard and been
represented by those who could be replaced if they overstepped their authority.
The EU was merely a proxy for government everywhere; what is happening in Hong
Kong, France and Kashmir are all expressions of rejection of imposed rule.
You can plead all you like that no deal was not what we
voted for and that yes, a deal should have been easy – regulatory alignment,
harmonised standards, common values and all of that – but we are where we are
and the EU has made it plain as can be that negotiations are over. But that’s
not good enough for Hammond, with this being released from No. 10 and tweeted
by Sebastian Payne of the FT: "Hammond and Clarke sabotaged the UK’s
preparations to leave… They drove the country into a dangerous cul de sac with
a clock ticking towards Oct 31 because they never accepted the referendum
result and they fought to overturn it…”
Bercow's legacy
I reasonably expect and fervently wish that, should we ever
actually leave the wretched and institutionally corrupt European Union, all-pervasive and
extensive investigations will be undertaken into each and every quisling politician
involved in what I shall dub Bercowism. And I hope that once those investigations
are concluded the results are made fully public and the guilty brought to book,
not just ushered away with a nice, neat peerage. ...Over my dead body, Bercow has all but said.
If that’s what it takes, John... if that’s
what it takes.
Great posting well done.
ReplyDelete"...Over my dead body, Bercow has all but said..."
ReplyDeleteI find his terms to be most acceptable.