A Rush of Blood

Naturally there is outrage over the attempted murder of Salman Rushdie. Leaders throughout the west have come out in utter condemnation of islam and its adherents and untold £billions have now been committed to investigate and eradicate its pernicious effects on the modern world. Politicians have lined up to openly challenge the muslim infiltration of the west with vows to seek out and remove all those who kill, injure, rape or promote hatred in the name of allah.

Obviously, the opening paragraph is a just as much a pack of lies as is islam itself. Instead, guarded comments about extremism and radicalism have been carefully drafted and delivered so as to cause the minimum offence. The supposed ‘peaceful majority’ of muslims have remained obstinately silent because they belong to a cult whose creed is submission, total and unquestioning.

In fact, many voices have been heard to say we mustn’t jump to conclusions, we mustn’t encourage anti-muslim sentiment and we must condemn all who seek to take vengeful matters into their own hands. The arresting police in the USA have even stated that there is no known motive behind the attack. No motive, you cowardly lickspittles, no motive? The unredeemed fatwah, whose bounty for Rushdie’s death was even increased relatively recently. No motive for the attempt which has been openly praised by Iran’s state media? No motive for an action widely celebrated across the muslim sectors of social media?

And what do you make of this spokesman for islam in Britain telling muslims to stay quite because any comment, any media appearance would be a trap? The trap of course is that if you rejoice then you are admitting that islam is a barbaric and backward death-cult, but if you condemn it, you will in turn be fatwah’d by the same barbaric and backward death-cult. Well, excuse us if we take your call for silence as a silent approval.

 

 As always, our government will await the advice of the muslim council, or brotherhood, or whatever authority they kneel to, before making any kind of a move. They will consult muslim clerics to learn what help and support they require in this, their hour of need. But of one thing you can be absolutely certain, the victim here will turn out to be the islamic community, forever beset by the evils of ‘islamophobia’.

Haven’t we heard enough, had enough, of all this? The religion will not reform; islamic scholars imported from Pakistan will ensure it. Entire communities will continue to be segregated from the population they feed off, their female children unschooled, their wives ignorant of the English language for fear they may hear an alternative doctrine. All we hear about these days are human rights, but within the religion of submission there are no rights except what their perfect model, the child-raping mohammed, decreed.

They even tell us, repeatedly, that they will prevail and that British women, western women, will submit to the veil, that they will rape the infidel women to create bastard muslims, that soon their number will be legion. We hear this, we see it, but by all accounts our governments do not. Is it because they fear the wrath of khan and his cohorts, or is it that they genuinely believe the muslim propaganda that opposing them is worse than the holocaust? Or is it something else altogether?

If the Twin Towers wasn’t enough to open their eyes and the London Bridge attacks and the Lee Rigby killing, and the thousands upon thousands of young girls raped and murdered by Pakistani gangs, and the open aggression visited upon white people in muslim-only zones of former great cities… what chance is there that the attempted murder of a celebrated, knighted author will make any difference? We have to give up any pretence that the government of the UK cares one jot for its rightful citizens.

(*Note for the uninitiated: As I do not believe islam to be a valid entity, I have refused to capitalise islamic terms because only proper nouns need to be capitalised. It is a small protest, but 'tis mine own)

Ding-Dong

Nobody can be in any doubt that we have entered the month of ramadan, a word unknown to 99% of Britons in the 1970s, but now known to everybody. Not least because at every possible opportunity we have islam rammed down our throats. When people speak of diverse communities they often mean segregated, ethnically monocultural islamic ghettoes, yet when politicians get to wooing their future core voters they are fulsome with their praise for all the wonders islam brings.

There’s… well there’s the science and technology for a start. Listening to some sycophants you would be led to believe that everything in the modern world was invented by nomadic desert dwellers in the middle ages. And then there are the simply marvellous advances in human rights. As everybody knows, the muslim culture embraces equality for all; let us never forget what they have done to advance the causes of feminism and acceptance of LGBT lifestyles.

Oh, lazy, I hear you cry; going for the same old anti-islamic tropes. Well, why not, I say, because they are there, in plain sight, even though an increasing number of dhimmies refuse to see it. There’s another islamic word that has entered into our lexicon, along with halal, haram, jihad and many, far too many more. This creeping acceptance of a culture which is simply incompatible, without reform, with a modern world is brushed aside by our representatives in Parliament in a manner which is almost sinister.

What’s brought all this on? Well, you can’t have failed to observe that on England’s patron saint’s day, the great and the good were falling over themselves to wish us all a happy… ramalama-ding-dong. But now the Limp Dumbs have gone a step further and taken up a suggestion by one of their local councillors that they undertake the Ramadan fast and share their joy at the new understanding this will bring. Already we have seen tweets declaring this intent along with pictures of pre-dawn breakfasts and self-applause at dusk.

This could be seen as simple, cynical vote-grooming, but the Labour Party is already the official party of islam on these shores and I very much doubt that the Libdems can muster the level of doublethink that hard-left Labourites are brought up on; when it comes to hypocrisy Labour has all the cards. But I don’t think it is simple politicking, I think it’s worse. In the excellent but depressing book Submission, the French author Michel Houellebecq describes a France which, without a shot being fired, is quietly conquered by islam.

Read it and weep, for what he portends is already in an advanced stage both in France and here in the UK. And it is our own fault. Terrified at the prospect of offending minorities successive UK governments and official bodies, universities, police ‘services’, the judiciary and large sections of the media have gone out of their way to accommodate them. And the biggest ‘minority’ (which is a clear majority in many boroughs) for decades has been the followers of mohammad (peas be upon him).

As a result, standards have been relaxed and limited shortlists have been introduced to allow recruitment based on criteria other than merit. The police, the army, the NHS and other public purse organisation have been relentlessly bombarded with diversity propaganda until it has become a mantra: brown face good, white face bad. Advertising, although driven by profit, has followed the trend, so wherever you turn you are presented an image of Britain which bears no resemblance to the one in which you live… unless you live in the woke bubble of Medialand.

The steady drip, drip, drip of Islamification is a process which, unlike open warfare, is hard to combat. We have a democratic system, notwithstanding electoral fraud, which allows anybody to stand. And we have electoral wards where the overwhelming majority will put muslim representatives into office. We have politically correct governance which promotes inclusion and applauds whenever a non-white, non-Christian is appointed to the cabinet, then calls for more. And we voted for all of this. Make no mistake: The future is dark; the future is islam.

Submission

News came in the other day that Frankfurt is now a German minority city. In trying to excuse this, much was made of the detail that no other ethnic/geographic minority is represented in greater numbers than native white Germans, but the fact remains that the majority of Frankfurters  are not indigenous. And this statistic only involves the documented aliens; it is well-known that certain immigrant populations have a habit of harbouring many illegals.

It’s a far cry from the Aryan dream, but of course that’s a source of delight to the so-called liberal elites who are so intent in atoning for the long ago sins of their grandfathers. But it is happening everywhere, not just in Germany. Coudenhove-Kalergi, they cry, the systematic eradication of the peoples of Europe, but is it all much simpler than that? For, seriously, how could you impose the will of a few warped theorists on the populations of the world's great democracies? Surely, the average voter would simply not stand for it.

The boiling frog analogy is often used to explain why what, in some eyes, is such an obvious plot; keep turning up the temperature and they won’t notice until it is too late. But we did notice; we noticed and objected decades ago. Unfortunately, a combination of white guilt, the dominance of leftism in political thinking and the drip-drip-drip of pro-mass-immigration and open borders ideology throughout the EU has left us with nations divided.

But that is the plan, they insist. Is it? Is it really? Or is it just the perpetual frailty of political leaders, forever seeking to follow the zeitgeist and fearing what backing the old order will do to their careers? Is it a deliberate infiltration into our systems of power, justice, education and social order by fifth columnists, or is it merely the result of courting the youth vote?  Wilson was our first Prime Minister to openly seek the approval of the young, for whom the rainbow nation of peaceful integration is a misguided aspiration, but it probably came to its apotheosis during the Blair years.

Recognising where we are now, however, is far more important than seeking to point to some shadowy conspiracy. Our tolerance is being used against us and in its muddled, misguided way, the establishment appears to like it that way. The muslim community, in particular, seems to know how to work the system: closed communities, crying victim, demanding special treatment – and with every concession they see the opportunity for more. This appears to be happening in all the major cities of Europe - London, Brussels, Amsterdam are all non-majority native population cities now.

And what do we do? From the top they keep beating the ‘all immigration is good immigration’ drum, a tactic rapidly losing traction but doggedly adhered to. The form of words keeps changing but the message is the same; accept it, submit. Submission is the basic premise of islam. People like Tommy Robinson and Anne Marie Waters are derided as extremists, although they are just articulating what many of us have seen with our own eyes but do not have the platform, or the balls, to say it. They are pointing out what is wrong; not blowing people up. Who are the real enemies of the people here?

Where will it end? I think our society is too fractured to cope. In an effort to be emollient, to not cause offence, to be British about it, we are lying down and letting it happen. We all eat halal now because we have no way of knowing otherwise. We are all beaten into submitting to islamic demands that we respect their culture; police won’t police without the permission of the imams; white children are pictured imitating islamic prayer; female genital mutilation is, effectively, tolerated; sharia courts are allowed to proliferate. Unless a real resistance appears – because mainstream government is clearly toothless here – they have already won. Soon indigenous minorities will be the norm in the capitals and in a generation or so it will be whole countries. There doesn’t need to be a plan; we are accepting it; we are submitting.

Foaming?

We moved out of our street just about when the beheading started. Chucking the gays off the taller buildings and setting fire to women who dared show their hair was one thing; we thought, you know, it’s just their way. But it turned out that being male and straight wasn’t enough and those who couldn’t grow a half-decent beard in double quick time soon found themselves on the wrong end of the sharia patrols. Oh and when the chippie shut up shop we knew something wasn’t right. Keith had kept that shop open all through the Kentucky fried chicken riots and the kebab wars; he even dared to stay open late, after the pubs had turned out, but one Saturday evening he just didn’t turn up and that was that.

Next thing we knew it was a halal paper shop or something and we all remarked about how quickly the sale had gone through. After that it was almost a race with house after house putting out For Sale signs and each one being knocked down to less than the last. You hear about house prices in that London – sellers’ market and all that - but here in the old steel towns you take what you can get. I’m bound to get stick for saying it but here on the outskirts of the town my family have lived in for generations everybody says that Enoch was right. Even those who don’t know what an Enoch is...

A story in the Express talks about the bifurcating towns of England; towns splitting on cultural lines and in a follow up, Blackburn comes in for particular scrutiny. If you want a glimpse of pie in the blue sky thinking here, from the first link, are the words of Professor Ted Cantle:

“The focus of policy needs to shift, this is not just about minorities. Politicians and policy-makers need to encourage white British residents to remain in diverse areas. To choose, rather than avoid, diverse areas when they do re-locate, encouraging similar choices with respect to placing pupils in diverse schools. In other words to create a positive choice for mixed areas and a shared society.”

He clearly hasn’t been involved in the process himself. Yeah, right Ted, you keep on smashing away at that square peg all you like but the only way it will fit into the round hole is if you irrevocably damage it.

Multiculturalism is an ideology imposed by clever people who only really associate with other clever people, who are so clever they have trained themselves, yogi-like, to transcend the mortal plane and can’t see cultural differences except as fascinating anthropology. They are so clever that they can look at people from different racial origins and declare they are identical; so clever they can imagine equality and diversity living in harmonious communes. So clever are they that the emperor’s tailors could sell them whole wardrobes of nothing and they could look in the mirror and see only finery.

Well, call me racist but it really isn’t like that at all. Once, the inhabitants of these islands comprised separate warring tribes and many centuries of war and interbreeding finally united the kingdom under one monarch and one set of cultural norms with regional variants but common purpose. Incomers were rapidly assimilated and despite the aphoristic marching whine of the sociologists: ‘we are a nation of immigrants’ the British were largely genetically homogeneous until around the mid-nineteenth century. Immigration didn’t so much change us, but we certainly changed immigrants; that’s why they came here.

But that’s not happening any more. Our oh-so clever and oh-so egalitarian social engineers have ignored the cries of the displaced masses and imposed what amounts to a cultural invasion too big to assimilate and in refusing to integrate it is reversing that homogeneity. The biggest threat to our security is not racial, however, it is an ideology called islam. Soon there may be not only muslim-only sectors, but entire muslim-only towns. When there are British towns in which no British people live - for islam sets itself above history and heredity - we are back to antipathetic, warring tribes. Who does not now see portents of "the River Tiber foaming with much blood'?