Why should we?

David Lammy has been driving up his blood pressure again as he leapt aboard the anti-Trump train. The serial race-baiter couldn’t help but plough in with his obsessive aversion to the biggest white whale of all - the so-called leader of the free world. And so bizarrely sensitive to the baiters was Mrs May that she wobbled in the Commons yesterday as she tried to pretend she wasn’t going to cosy up to The Donald when he visits and was instead going to stand up to him. (Clue: She’s not.)

National leaders and supposed opinion-formers the world over are screeching negatively about his tough illegal immigrant border policy, even as their own constituents are loudly cheering him on... But what should we do, let them all in? There is a category of out-of-touch, new-world-order advocate that would simply throw the doors open wide. Come on, come all, for, in their eyes, all darker-tinged foreigners are somehow ‘better’ than all pale, gammonous, indigenous nationals.

Downtrodden people from rough, brutish regimes are sold dreams of riches in the first world and then aided and abetted in their quest by the dreaming acolytes of the political left. And yes, the world perhaps should be a lovely, fluffy place where everybody respects and loves everybody else. But the peddlers of this never-to-be-realised fiction are rarely disadvantaged by the realities that come with it, whereas those who are most directly affected are denied the voice to object.

What we see – every time - is these whole-worlders violently attacking the only part of society which pays for it. Metaphorically and sometimes literally biting the hand that feeds it. Desperate people, from barbaric cultures, promised a heaven on earth, are slow to adopt the tolerant laisse-faire attitudes of the generous host and instead revert to the methods that worked in their homelands. And the response when we point this out? “But what about ze cheeldren!”

The bleeding hearts simply cannot comprehend why we can’t put up with a bit of mild cultural displacement, segregation and ghettoisation in the interests of world peace. What’s a bit of moderate white flight when several million net recipients get to share in our barely adequate resources? So your kids have to become minorities in their own schools and you get to wait a few more years for your hip replacement? It’s a small price to pay, surely, in order to increase the maternity ward bed count.

What is wrong with wanting to keep what we have worked for? Why should we pay for illegal immigrants to simply pour across our borders and then demand – literally demand – that they be fed and clothed and housed and educated and treated and settled and be absolved their original crime and excused any further crimes? Why should we celebrate their malignant presence as ‘enrichment’ even as they preach against the very western values they have milked? Trump is dead right to stand firm. Put up with it? Why should we?

Europe by Numbers

If you held a national vote and two-thirds of the electorate turned out you would be elated, wouldn’t you? In order to win the Brexit referendum, 72% of British voters cast their ballot and despite all the best efforts of Project Fear, 52% of them - 37% of the total eligible – carried the day. In the UK the Conservatives gained a majority in Parliament with 37% of the 66% turnout. The UK is now governed by a party which gained a majority with the expres support of just 24%, give or take a point, of the total eligible electorate. It’s legitimate; the election date was known years in advance.

In Hungary 98% of the 43% who actually voted agreed with the motion to reject immigration quotas. That’s 42% of the total electorate, but it failed to meet the required 50% turnout for a mandate. Not because people were not bothered, but because the opposition knew they couldn’t possibly win, so opted to stay away in order to force a no-vote. Fair play, using the rules of the game but sometimes gamesmanship looks like nothing so much as sour grapes.

The simple fact of the matter is that Orban’s view is the prevailing one. 42% of the eligible vote would be a landslide political parties would kill for and who knows what they would have scored if everybody with the right had actually voted. Hungary should have the power to decide whether or not to resettle migrants, wherever they come from. And then they should be able to decide how many, set criteria for their selection and insist that later they either move back to their country of origin or else integrate and accept Hungary’s culture, law and customs in their entirety.

But that’s not what will happen, is it? Once in, they’re largely in for good and being muslim in the main, once they reach a critical mass – which is single-figure percentages – they demand special treatment. What is it with the political elite and those in their thrall that they can call an overwhelming declaration of support for a policy invalid, yet uphold the right of a tiny minority to overturn hundreds of years of tradition? Because this, undeniably, is islam’s ambition.

Just another form of vermin...

One of the hallmarks of a civilised country is to settle disputes at the ballot box, not on the battlefield but this continued enforcement of unrestricted immigration is rapidly turning all of Europe into a potential killing zone. I can’t see any of this ending well and Mrs Merkel’s may well be one of the first heads paraded on a pike, given her reception in Dresden. You can play the numbers game all you like but in the end they all tell much the same story. It’s time somebody turned Europe off and then turned it back on again. The resurgence of the right may very well do exactly that.

Europe by Numbers

If you held a national vote and two-thirds of the electorate turned out you would be elated, wouldn’t you? In order to win the Brexit referendum, 72% of British voters cast their ballot and despite all the best efforts of Project Fear, 52% of them - 37% of the total eligible – carried the day. In the UK the Conservatives gained a majority in Parliament with 37% of the 66% turnout. The UK is now governed by a party which gained a majority with the expres support of just 24%, give or take a point, of the total eligible electorate. It’s legitimate; the election date was known years in advance.

In Hungary 98% of the 43% who actually voted agreed with the motion to reject immigration quotas. That’s 42% of the total electorate, but it failed to meet the required 50% turnout for a mandate. Not because people were not bothered, but because the opposition knew they couldn’t possibly win, so opted to stay away in order to force a no-vote. Fair play, using the rules of the game but sometimes gamesmanship looks like nothing so much as sour grapes.

The simple fact of the matter is that Orban’s view is the prevailing one. 42% of the eligible vote would be a landslide political parties would kill for and who knows what they would have scored if everybody with the right had actually voted. Hungary should have the power to decide whether or not to resettle migrants, wherever they come from. And then they should be able to decide how many, set criteria for their selection and insist that later they either move back to their country of origin or else integrate and accept Hungary’s culture, law and customs in their entirety.

But that’s not what will happen, is it? Once in, they’re largely in for good and being muslim in the main, once they reach a critical mass – which is single-figure percentages – they demand special treatment. What is it with the political elite and those in their thrall that they can call an overwhelming declaration of support for a policy invalid, yet uphold the right of a tiny minority to overturn hundreds of years of tradition? Because this, undeniably, is islam’s ambition.

Just another form of vermin...

One of the hallmarks of a civilised country is to settle disputes at the ballot box, not on the battlefield but this continued enforcement of unrestricted immigration is rapidly turning all of Europe into a potential killing zone. I can’t see any of this ending well and Mrs Merkel’s may well be one of the first heads paraded on a pike, given her reception in Dresden. You can play the numbers game all you like but in the end they all tell much the same story. It’s time somebody turned Europe off and then turned it back on again. The resurgence of the right may very well do exactly that.

Out of the mouths

The Conservatives are promising to make illegal immigration, er… illegal. It strikes me that the very term ‘illegal’ surely carries with it the explicit notion that you are doing something the law doesn't permit. It seems odd then, that they had to make another law making it ‘specifically’ illegal as opposed to, I guess, ‘sort-of’ illegal. Is this anything to do with EU influence over our jurisdiction? Or is it yet another home-grown fuck up?

Maybe the switch of focus onto illegal immigration is an attempt to steer us away from the massive problem of the 318,000 – almost a third of a million – net immigration figure of the last twelve months. Remember that is net; it doesn't reveal the real total of people coming in, which turns out to be double that at 641,000, which means that 323,000 people left the country during the same period. Some of that number will be made up of immigrants returning home but how many are native Brits fleeing the sinking ship?

Britain is changing beyond recognition, just as Tony Blair and his cronies intended, but the biggest change is not from accommodating Europeans, with many of the civil and cultural values we hold, because 290,000 of the incomers are not from Europe at all and Brexit would not help. Of course ‘not from Europe’ does not mean Canadians, Australians, Americans and others; it means overwhelmingly an invasion which has been gathering pace for some time. It means a change so significant that even children can plainly see what our leaders refuse to.

During the years of branding native British identity as shameful and not to be celebrated few non-politicians can fail to have noticed how the younger generation are being replaced. The Michaels are being replaced by mohammeds, the Alices by Aishas. A recent study reveals that the view from the playground is that muslims are taking over the country. But if you read the article in the Independent you will notice that it makes a big deal of the lack of awareness of the children. It completely ignores the reality they see around them, much as modern politics refuses to see the raging fire it is trying to extinguish with a cup of water.

You heard it in the playground...

Meanwhile, in the Middle East playground ISIS is sacking Palmyra in its unquenchable lust to return the world to a stone-age caliphate. Does anybody seriously doubt the aim of muslims in Britain to eventually dominate and impose the sharia in Britain's islamic state? Especially when vocal elements have publicly declared exactly that intent. Whatever your reaction to that statement, whatever your conditioning has compelled you to screech, it is not racist to point out that people who don’t look like us, don’t speak like us and don’t share our values should be treated with suspicion. Strikes me that the kids are all right.

Beds in Sheds

Admiral of the Fleet Sir Caspar John was advanced to Knight Grand Cross of the Most Honourable Order of the Bath in 1960 and served as First Sea Lord from 1960 until his retirement in 1963.  Mention his name to any Royal Naval officer, however, and it will evoke the memory of soporific sessions in the theatre and lecture hall at Britannia Royal Naval College named in his memory. Caspar John Hall was normally referred to as CJH, or for tired trainees grabbing an opportunistic forty winks, the Zed Shed. (The lights go down and two-hundred sleepy heads begin to nod... it’s almost like a drill.)

Meanwhile, today in Slough a military-style airborne endeavour has been in operation for some time to root out its disproportionate share of literal zed sheds. On Nick Ferrari’s morning radio show this ongoing story produced plenty of angry responses. People sleeping in sheds is a long-term problem in Slough as in many places elsewhere in the UK with exploitation of hordes of often unregistered and uncounted denizens. This sort of barbarous arrangement is so far removed from traditional, civilised, British behaviour that it must surely be illegal to draw attention to it.

So, bollocks to that. The people of Slough have been aware of literally thousands of illegal and/or exploited immigrants, living in secret and in a squalor that probably reminds them of home. These people contribute nothing to British society yet place an enormous burden on services for which others pay. But years of reporting such alien transgressions by people with unacceptable and repulsive white skin has been met by a system that strenuously denies there is a problem. Back in the cold war days, Americans used to refer to reds under the bed. Now here in Britain we have the reds encouraging beds in sheds.

There is an entire industry devoted to denying the problems that multiculturalism has brought to these shores, formerly so robustly defended by Caspar John and his Jolly Tars. Were it possible, Hearts of Oak would be breaking asunder in their watery graves. Whatever happened to our identity and our collective security? How have we become so low that we dare not prosecute our own laws for anxious fear of offending people who have no such compunction in our direction?

"Come friendly bombs and rain on Slough"

But there is good news, the system is fighting back and while we can’t remove those who should not be here and those who would cause us harm, who openly deride our society and exploit our tolerance and would happily see us all dead, at least the full force of the law has been brought to bear on the evil white Australian, Trenton Oldfield, jailed and now being deported for disrupting the boat race. Abu Qatada must be laughing his cock off.