Katie Hopkins and LBC have parted ways. The malicious
left are, in their loving, caring, kinder politics manner, gleefully infesting
social media with group hugs, tears of joy and hopes that she dies in agony,
from bottom cancer or suchlike. Of course, the vile Hopkins is guilty of the
most nauseating, most violent, most despicable of modern offences and she has
brought censure on herself. Stalin, Mussolini, Pol Pot... such despots always
meet a sticky end, love triumphing over hate when they are strung up by a
baying mob.
What did Katie do to attract such opprobrium? She dared
to articulate what millions feel they cannot. She voiced the genuine feelings
of a majority who are not cowed by political correctness and a fear of
denouncement. She stood up for reason in a world which seems devoid of it at
times. And she faced down the howls of knee-jerk demands to silence her from
the very quarters engaged in suppression of freedoms in the west. And she will
be back, because she’s right.
After many years of proposed solutions to the problems
caused by an effective submission to islam in the west. After years of ‘nothing
to do with islam’ uttered by political clones after every atrocity claimed in
the name of the prophet (pieces be upon him). After the inanity of vigils and
silences and voices raised against the aggrieved instead of the aggressors, she
simply said what many, many people want. An end to it all. Finally. A final solution
to the islamic problem. There, I said it too.
The very thing that the islamists want to deny us, up to and
including life itself, is our freedom. Time after time after time, they have declared
that they see us as less than them. They will have us as slaves, or not at all.
They say they hate us they say they want us dead and I say they have the right
to say these things. I welcome their openness; it makes everything so much
simpler. They want us dead, we want them gone, finally.
Jeremy Corbyn can use terror all he likes, he can blame
all of terrorism on the actions of former western governments and he can openly
consort with whoever he wishes. Isn’t that the mark of a free society? But what
is sauce for the goose, must also be at least a blob of relish for the gander.
All calls for suppression of speech must be resisted; one man’s rallying cry is
another’s hate speech. I say we should be able to call a spade a spade and not
get arrested for racism because of it.
Yes, I accept that this means some people, especially
young, radical peace warriors, might have to hear language of which they
disapprove. Yes, it means that some people may be so mortally offended they may
have to take to their beds. And of course the Penny Reds and Owen Gays and Jon
Snowflakes and Jobby O’Briens might have to suffer being pointed at and mocked
some more but it’s a small price to pay. It’s either free speech or officially approved
speech; which would you prefer?
