Marshall McLuhan said, “Control the media. Control
the message.” Control the message, judged Tony Blair, control the sheeple. Oh,
how easily he and his media team must have groomed the BBC and others to carry
out its bidding. And how they must have hated the rise of social media, whereby
alternative messages could rise and compete with the party line. But, lest you forget
and forgive the party line was and remains among the deeply indoctrinated, thus:
‘Multiculturalism can only be good’. ‘Love thy neighbour above thine own’. ‘The
English as a race are not worth saving’. ‘The problem is white men’. ‘Red
rosettes good, blue rosettes bad; Tories are evil’. ‘We need immigrants because
we are not capable’.
Under the New Labour project the metaphorical Tannoys
crackled to life at the appointed hour and the assembled throngs bathed in the
sound of their glorious leader. They all cheered because the voice told them
that things could only get better and as they got worse they cheered all the
louder because the voice told them that only racists couldn’t see the fine new
clothes. Fists pumped the air in the party salute as the voice led the party
prayer to the sacred NHS and welcome mats were lovingly woven and laid out to
welcome in our saviours. Immigrants good, indigenous bad. Replace our own
huddled masses, distort our loyalties.
While those who have grown up through the last twenty years
are poorly equipped to critically examine the world, enough sound-bites and
headlines, scraps of speeches, reportage and memories exist to support a plausible
population replacement programme theory. Plenty of retrospective warnings have
been examined and - taken at face value - speak of a deliberate plan to punish
European cultures for their historical successes. But none of them make sense
unless you buy into global conspiracies such as one world government, common
purpose and lizard people. And yet...
The message controllers say they stand for Peace and Love
and preach against the politics of the common man, the politics of Fear and Hate.
But what if what we are hearing and now seeing from Sweden is exactly what it
looks like? Because it looks to me like you would be well advised to fear the
massive influx of what Pat Condell calls third world muslim men, who genuinely
appear to hate us.
Donald Trump was slated by the media worldwide when he
made reference to Sweden’s problems and their Prime Minister bent double to
play down the issues. ‘Fake News!’ they cried. But whose fake news? If Donald
Trump is so stupid, as they insist, that he believes fake news, how come he is also
clever enough to use fake, fake news to confound his opponents? Who knows what’s
real any more? Well, I’d say the people under attack know what’s real, the
indigenous citizens undergoing self-imposed nightly curfews in fear of their
lives.
They look pretty wild to me.
And anyway, if islamic African culture is so much better than ours, why risk diluting it with our worthlessness by bringing them here? Surely, you saviours of multiculturalism – which, of course, really means any culture except white European – would be better to put your energies into preserving those precious diversities in their original habitat, rather than risk infecting them with the ‘diseases’ of civilisation. After all, zoos have fallen from grace of late; so disrespectful to be gawping at animals in captivity. If you genuinely care for islamic culture you should be lobbying to return those exotic species to the wild
