For those wondering – both of you – where I’ve been, I’ve
been banned from Twitter again. The first time it was for calling a soppy cunt
a soppy cunt, which I sort of believed was the whole point of Twitter. This time
it is for a number of historical ‘offences’ relating to the religion of peas,
to wit; three old tweets which mildly criticised and questioned islam’s
intentions. Oddly, I wasn’t banned for the multiple occasions on which I have
called islam an outright cunt, which of course, it is.
Now I hear that the government is going to spend my money
– and yours – in framing a legal definition of islamophobia. Well, I can save
us all a lot of money by offering a working definition right now. islamophobia:
an entirely rational response to the imposition of third-world cultural norms,
the domination of city skylines by alien cult-worshipping structures and
subjugation of the native population to religious fervour and barbaric
attitudes to any form of opposition. That do you?
But it’s not just islam we should be worrying about.
There has been a ‘progressive’ assault on our liberties and identity over the
last few decades, propelled by the ludicrous and palpably false dogma that all immigration
is good immigration and non-European immigration is the best immigration of
all. Not only are we expected to accept and absorb the strictures of islam, but
we must also embrace the backward tribal enmities of machete wielding sub-Saharan
African ingrates. London is not becoming the murder capital of the developed world
because of pretty, young, Swedish exchange students.
And talking of the Nordic races, the Danish immigration
minister has dared to say openly a truth that so many of our own politicians are too
afraid to confront: Not all immigrants are good people here to contribute. Some lie and cheat and use our tolerance against us and we should not be afraid
of calling them out. The muslim community has been playing a long game under
our noses and doing exactly that for generations; soon we will have actual blasphemy
laws, not just the ersatz ones that got me suspended and have seen a few people jailed.
Yet still, in the midst of clear public anger, fear and
incomprehension that our governments cannot see that millions of minimum wage
workers with eight kids apiece, living in segregated ghettoes are, far from contributing, creating a huge
drain on resources, there is talk of an amnesty for illegal immigrants. An amnesty? For
crying out loud, even a huge proportion of legal immigrants are problem enough;
start legalising – because you admit defeat on finding and deporting – and where
does it all end? How soon before all you need to do is get one person from an African village onto British soil to create a conduit to import all of the rest?
In a ludicrous radio discussion on Radio 4’s PM the other
day it was even argued that if an illegal immigrant had been here paying taxes
for years they should be given right to remain. What? How are they paying taxes
without a National Insurance Number? And how did they get a NI number if they
are not legally allowed to be here? And if they are paying taxes, how in hell do we
not know who they are? It is little wonder that the general public, we little
people, not in possession of all the facts, unable to comment wisely and unwise
to comment negatively, are frustrated to boiling point by it all.
So while the Labour Party are angrily trying to force
Amber Rudd to resign, for an admittedly clumsy administrative oversight (come
on, who reads and remembers every sodding work email they ever received?) they
are hoping we will forget they also tried to appeal to the voters by doing the exact,
same thing. Read our lips: we want immigration rules controlled, regulated,
policed and ultimately enforced. And if that means a ‘hostile’ environment for
law-breakers so be it. This is why Amber Rudd should not only stay in office,
she should face up to her critics, tell them to fuck off and then do the same
with every illegal her resources can uncover.
