One of the things the English once liked to pride themselves
on was their tolerance and sense of fair play. Within the bounds of common
decency, British society used to be both liberal and disciplined; it was said you could pretty much do what you
wanted behind your own closed doors as long as you did no harm, but in front of
others you also knew how to behave. Live and let live; mustn’t grumble. We
queued, for heaven’s sake! Where did all that go?
In many extra-urban hamlets and small market towns the
spirit of England still exists with local life revolving around village
schools, community centres and the pub. But viewed through the multicultural
lens of ‘diverse’ and ‘vibrant’ and sometimes quite aggressive city dwellers
this rural idyll is something to be sneered at, to be ridiculed, to be labelled
regressive and ‘insanely white’ in the kind of reverse racism peddled in
articles such as this.
Yes, of course it’s The Guardian, although guardian of
what you may well wonder. The ‘Deep Britain’ of the article is a
backwards-facing, timid world, afraid of foreigners and fearful of progress. The
supportive comments are just as indicative of whom this piece is aimed at
entertaining. Funny, then, how so many of those jeering from the side-lines
will aspire to buy up property and inflate its price beyond the pockets of the
local-born in an effort to later enter into that world they despised so much
from their metropolitan strongholds. Hypocrisy is a cruelly ironic teacher.
So often those who fly the flag for mass immigration and
rule from Brussels are the least affected by the negative effects and have the
most to gain from subjecting the general population to its less desirable
spin-offs. The Kinnocks and Peter Mandelson spring, unbidden, to mind as
examples of those who have profited from the cynical selling off of Britain’s sovereignty;
failed politicians who have nevertheless fallen off the fence and into the
trough. Michael Caine said he would rather be a poor master than a rich servant,
for which he received an outpouring of scorn from the usual, bien pensant sources.
The motives of vocal enthusiasts for the EU’s supranational
supremacy and uncontrolled movement of people are highly suspect. The demonstrable
effects of our 40-year dalliance with this nightmare are evident. The low wage
economy pushed lower, welfare dependency becoming endemic for some, a rise in
gun and knife crime and everywhere communities under stress. Yes we also have
highly skilled foreign worker in high-tech industries, banking and the hospitality
industry. And yes, they work in our health service too, but we could have this
anyway.
Is this really so bad?
Britain has long been open to immigration; to say
otherwise is simply a lie. But we have also long held a strong national identity,
which is now sorely challenged by the intransigent and near-sighted who want to
limit our prospects outside the EU; in effect to punish those of us who still
remember and cherish Britishness for our failure to be brainwashed by the siren
call of big state, big brother socialism. We're watching you. Deep England? Oh yes. Our sense of
belonging is far deeper ingrained than your shallow, superficial, naïve fantasy
of a rainbow world. Watch and learn, children, watch and learn.
