When the Brexit vote came in we had a bit of a gloat. Not
a massive, in-your-face, dance-on-your-grave affair just a jubilant punching of
the air and a relatively quiet, satisfied sigh of relief. Despite all the might
of the establishment – every part of the establishment – we held our nerve and
won through. Our celebrations were cautionary because we knew that it wasn’t
going to be game over – the biased ref wasn’t going to blow the whistle for
full time, he was just going to add injury time to insult and give the opposition
time to wear us down.
But now, after three and half years of extra time we are
still at one-nil despite penalty after penalty being awarded against us. They have
challenged the legality of the Leave campaign and continue to insist it was
rigged when all the evidence for rigging points to their side. They have impugned
our intelligence, our motives and our very right to even cast a vote, but we
are still clinging on to that full-time result, all those months ago. When
David Cameron said this would be our decision and that Parliament would enact
it he wasn’t lying, he just didn’t expect to have to honour that promise.
And then came yesterday, the day the law took sovereign
power for itself. Of all the people who should worry about yesterday’s blatant flouting
of any respect for democracy, Jeremy Corbyn stands head and shoulders above the
crowd and he ought to be thoroughly ashamed of himself. ‘Parliamentary
sovereignty’ was supposed to be the people’s weapon against the might of the
throne, the might of the establishment. But parliament only borrows its weight
from the people and the question of whose interests are protected should never arise.
The rule of law held that nobody was above or beyond justice
and no matter how many times we saw that this wasn’t true, that justice was for
sale, we held a last bit of hope that when it came to the crunch, the law would
protect us, every one, as equally as if we were a lord or a prince… or a former
public servant who lied and took us to war or ruin. Well, let that lie now be
exposed to the world. You can argue until you are blue that the supreme court judges
were basing their decision purely on the law and nothing else, but it won’t wash, any
more than OJ Simpson’s glove or Alastair Campbells weapons of mass destruction.
Labour was founded on the principles of social justice,
to fight for the rights of those who could not afford the expensive, legal
kind. It is pledged to be on the side of that common law wish for equality and
recognition. It is supposed to be the champion of the downtrodden masses but now they call their expressed wish 'populism' –
they spit the word as if it offends their very being – the will of the masses.
But look where labour is now; it is on the side of a fanatical, jingoistic
nationalism whose entire purpose is to ride roughshod over democracy.
The EU isn’t
democratic, no matter what its apologists pretend. It would eradicate the franchise in a
heartbeat if it could. In place of national pride they instil a sense of belonging
to some dream project for peace and prosperity when really it is about power; the
kind of power the supreme court has just grabbed for itself and given to
speaker Bercow to wield as he sees fit. Those who cheerlead for the EU, for the
judges, for the deposing of a genuinely popular Prime Minister are stoking the
fervour of be-flagged, starry-eyed devotees of a despotic regime, where Big
Brother provides everything, including your vote.
"Old people stole our future"*
Look at the mobs. Look at the noisy, bellicose, arrogant,
sneering throngs, chanting and beseeching and wallowing as if in the throes of
a divine intervention. These people are beyond reason and beyond truth, just as
the supreme court is above and beyond the common law. They call Brexiters self-harming
fanatics, but with few exceptions what I see are ordinary people, who normally
take little interest in politics, now aghast at the way in which their
assumptions of freedom and rights have been violently taken from them. Who are
the real extremists here?
(*Credit to @MarcherLord1 on Twitter)
Under our unwritten constitution the Supreme Court is not above the law. In UK the courts have never had the right to make law and they endanger our whole legal system if they do. I agree the court has made law and placed our nation in a perilous situation by so doing. We are now in dangerous uncharted waters and maybe its time we had a written constitution to prevent power mad remainer judges subverting justice.
ReplyDeleteIt appears to be well past time for a formal constitution, but who will get to write it? Not Mr Joe Average, that's for sure. Can anyone visualise the establishment allowing written guaranteed protection for freedom of speech, thought, or association? Not a chance! The establishment has shown very clearly that IT is determined to be the the final arbiter of whatever minimal rights it grudgingly allows us to have.
ReplyDelete