The desperate search for a killer cause to swing the
election in favour of the Party of No Personal Responsibility is now working
the “Boo hoo, Tories cut police funding” line. Hey, you can have as many police
officers as you like, so long as you can pay them. Of course, if the
Conservatives increased the numbers of officres on the thin blue line, Labour would accuse
them of presiding over a police state. The purpose of opposition is, after all,
to oppose, no matter how ridiculous it makes you look. But whatever you propose
you have to be able to afford it.
A penny on income tax, said one twitter moron, the
argument being that low earners would pay nothing, as they already do, high
earners would hardly notice and everybody would be happy to pay up. But, of
course, the extra this might raise (ignoring
that prices would rise to compensate, consumption would fall, the cost of
living would increase and then the lowest paid will be negatively impacted)
might theoretically pay for one of Labour’s pledges. But what of the others;
another penny here, another penny there? Before we know it we’d be back with
the traditional inflationary spiral with interest rates headed for ‘Oh-my-good-God!’
and never-ending pay battles with newly emboldened unions.
The centrist line has always been ‘there is no magic
money tree’ but as is the modern way, the left are attempting to use this as an
argument against common sense by suggesting that yes, there is. This disingenuous
article in The Guardian says we can pay nurses, policemen, teachers, etc, all we want, after all, we magicked-up the money for the ‘evil’ bankers back in
2008, so we can do it again... and again. It’s a tempting theory, but it is simply wrong; it is as
wrong as Gordon Brown selling off the gold reserves and pretending this was
clever economics. No more boom and what, Gordon?
And just as with all the other new-world-order, illuminati,
Bilderberg conspiracies and the rest it feeds neatly into the ‘unfair’
narrative peddled by the left. It’s not your fault you earn less, it’s because
those nasty Tories, in cahoots with the bankers want to keep you down. But
surely it takes only a second of rational thought to reason that, if people are
kept poor, consumption is kept low and profits suffer. If it was as easy as
fairy-tale believing left wingers seem to think, why doesn’t evil capitalism
indulge in ‘trickle-up’ economics? After all, a comfortably off population is a
contented population, everybody would be happy and everybody would be richer; a
socialist wet dream!
Yes, the money tree is real, dear, it is just as real as human
equality. I’m guessing that when the flaws in the print-more-money theories are
pointed out, along with the failures of socialist states to bring about the
wished for prosperity, the response will be that the magic money tree has never
been tried properly! Take out your Occam’s Razor and
slice; if it was this easy, if the left had an answer on the lines of what this
columnist is proposing, don’t you think they would have applied it, somewhere
in the world? Or is the failure to conjure something from nothing yet another
conspiracy against the workers?
A vote for Labour?
By all means, dream. Imagine winning the lottery, or
coming up big on the gee-gees, or inheriting from a forgotten millionaire
uncle, or even – cross fingers – imagine a government waving a magic wand and making
you rich at a stroke. Dream of unlimited resources for every public service
imaginable; nobody can stop you dreaming. But when you wake up, for heaven’s
sake, sober up before you consider voting for what, in the cold light of day,
is revealed to be a simple lie.
No comments:
Post a Comment