Yesterday I heard for the first time about relational
poverty. Relative poverty I get, I have been watching those shifting goalposts
for years; relative poverty is when your mate has the latest iPhone and you do
not. But ‘relational’? I Googled and I came up with this: “Relational poverty
i) shifts from thinking about ‘the poor and poor others’ to relationships of
power and privilege, ii) works across boundaries to foster a transnational,
comparative and interdisciplinary approach to poverty research, iii) involves
multidirectional theory building that incorporates marginalized voices to build
innovative concepts for poverty research.”
Does it, by Jove? Blimey, much like racism, just when you
thought you had a handle on the word, along comes a definition to place the
blame fairly on your own, already overburdened white shoulders. Not content
with being personally responsible for slavery, injustice, apartheid, coastal
erosion, big pharma, antibiotic resistance, super bugs, cancer and climate
change, not to mention actual poverty, it seems I must now carry the can
for some people feeling a bit poor in the self-esteem department.
I researched a little bit more and came across The
Relational Poverty Network, which august body: “convenes a community of scholars, working within and beyond academia,
to develop conceptual frameworks, research methodologies, and pedagogies for
the study of relational poverty. Launched at a historical moment of dramatic
income inequality and enforced austerity in the global North, the RPN thinks
across geographical boundaries to foster a transnational and comparative
approach to poverty research.”
Still none the wiser, I sought some clarity and I may
have discovered the source. One Bruce Perry wrote a book called ‘Born for Love’
described in this 2014 blog by Stephanie Heck PhD : Perry says we need to show more ‘emotional generosity’ and there we have it –
daddy issues. Sigmund Freud has so much to answer for. Not content with inventing the pseudo-science of psychotherapy, he went on to spawn a whole industry in creating and then treating a panoply of almost entirely confected and self-inflicted neuroses.
Meanwhile the worthy members of the Relational Poverty
Network come together, no doubt over fancy biscuits and posh coffee, in order to:
·
expand thinking about the causes of poverty
·
develop collaborative projects that cross
disciplinary and geographical boundaries
·
bring scholars, teachers, policy makers and
activists into intentional collaboration
·
build the next generation of scholars and
scholarship on relational poverty
So, wow, poverty studies is an actual thing; who knew?
And much as with all the other branches of identity politics – race, sex, gender, colour religion
etc, etc, etc, it pivots about privilege and you can bet your bottom dollar who
cops the blame...
Maybe this is actually the rationale behind the increasingly
parlous state of state education? Maybe this is why Tony Blair wanted everybody
to go to university? Ditch the apprenticeships, forego the drudge jobs
traditionally offered school-leavers – others (the genuinely poor, perhaps?) can do all that menial stuff –
let’s instead prepare the pampered first-world kids for the far richer pickings available in the
funding harvest. The only trouble is– and this operates at more levels than
just the financial – what will be the cost and who is going to pay?
This is how the great and the good while away their time. Its done to justify the obscene pay they grab and allows them to preach down to the Plebs. The language they use is called "newspeak" and its origins are detailed in Orwell's book Nineteen Eighty four. As for the cost its whatever our arrogant rulers want it to be and who will pay? You and I plus anyone who has the dignity to work for a living.
ReplyDelete