Fuck off and die. In the 1980s, that wee gem of coinage
was common currency. And here’s the thing; nobody died. Boil yer head, fuck
your mum, I’ll rip your head off and piss in your neck... I’ll fucking kill
you! Words, people; mere words. And no they don’t incite violence, they don’t
encourage others to act; if anything the extreme hyperbole of these wafer-thin
threats merely makes the utterer look like a bigger knob than the insultee at
which it was aimed.
So where did it all go wrong? When did sticks and stones
fade into impotence against the far more hurtful impact of - gosh - words? The
epithet ‘snowflake’ has perhaps been overused of late but how apt a metaphor to
describe the way in which our upcoming generations have been rendered weak
without a fist being raised? The Orwellian spectre of the language itself being
policed has long been warned about, even by those now doing that policing.
‘Free speech does not permit hate speech’ goes the mantra
of the millennial, but who gets to decide what that means? Currently ‘hate’
seems to consist of any opinion which isn’t in accord with the approved
doctrine, but like the secret password, today’s hurty words compendium is
administered by the select few who, alone, determine whose choice metaphor is the
more likely to bring about the next holocaust.
Seriously, it is that bad. To those who would curtail
your speech privileges there is nothing so urgent today as to cut off the fabled
rise of the far right; but even those nasty, hard bastard Nazis are today
reduced to whining about mean girls pulling their hair. Jo Brand, whatever
personal grudges you may harbour, was no more encouraging people to engage in
acid attacks on politicians than Nigel Farage was seriously suggesting he would
take up arms to pursue Brexit.
And so the argument moves on, not to what people genuinely
find offensive but to which side has shouldered the greater burden of hypocrisy.
Come on, guys, you must be able to be better than this. When one side is
making a complete horses-arse of themselves it is fair game to show them up for
it, but when it descends to this tit-for-tat, my-gang-is-less-of-a-twat-than-your-gang
malarkey, the tired old wit of Oscar Wilde begins to look like sparkling zeitgeist
repartee.
...wearing an appropriate emblem...
How about: All speech is free speech and we judge you by
your words? If you choose to be offended then poor you. If you choose to
repeat the unwise words of your youth then so be it. Back in the day, back when
the word ‘tolerance’ actually meant something, the idiots soon revealed their
idiocy... and we avoided or agreed with them accordingly. But maybe, in these
virtue-signalling days we should warn people before we open our mouths? Given
that everything I say will be judged to be ‘far right’ before I even say it, I’m
thinking of maybe wearing an appropriate emblem...
The thing is... "Don khaki and pick up a rifle" is obviously a metaphor. Throwing milkshakes at Brexiteers is a thing people literally do. Throwing acid at people is a thing people literally do. What Jo Brand suggested is a real possibility.
ReplyDeleteThe real reason we have word police now is that words are inherently more powerful than casual violence. Words are to be feared by the establishment as they can influence millions and have all sorts if unwanted effects. Giving me a bit of a kicking one night might shut me up but its effect is very limited. A dangerous idea can bring down part of the establishment with all its attendant damage to the bank balances and expense accounts of our ruling fat cats. As for making your voice heard in UK it looks like if you don't vote the right way your votes may well be burned today viva democracy or what?
ReplyDelete