It’s a curious thing, physics. And unlike fickle humanity
it tends to stick to the rules. Rules such as: you can’t get more work out than
you put in, no matter how much interviewed footballers believe otherwise. Then
there’s the Newtonian tendency for things to carry on doing what they were
doing unless external forces act on them. And in thermodynamics, as Flanders
and Swann so succinctly opined, ‘heat
can’t pass from a cooler to a hotter’. (‘You can try it if you like, but you’d far better notter!’) So when
it comes to boiling a kettle even the mighty EU is not in a position to alter
some basic facts.
By way of illustration let’s take tea. Regardless of
whatever you may wish to believe, it takes the same amount of energy to boil your
water, every time, assuming the same volume, starting temperature and pressure.
So, if your fast-boil, three kilowatt kettle takes three minutes to boil a
litre of water, a simple calculation will tell you that a two kilowatt kettle
will take half as long again, cost you the same and save the planet not one
single gram’s-worth of carbon footprint. Plus there’s a chance you’ll get
bored, wander off, forget about it then have to re-boil it ten minutes later
when you realise you’ve sat down to Corrie without a cuppa.
Kettles, toasters, cookers... if the EU gets its bizarre,
controlling, micro-wave-managing way everything will take longer; it’s almost
as if they’ve listened to a fifteen-year old ‘climate scientist’ driven by
idealism above reality, rather than real engineers and scientists and people who
can actually distinguish their arse from the pointy joint in the middle of
their arms. Given the parlous state of education and the increased emphasis on
not stressing out the kids it will only be a matter of time before voters
really will believe anything. I’m pretty sure that the meddlesome ideas factory
that is the EU plutocracy isn’t short of raw material but just in case, I have
come up with some schemes that may help.
Obviously, the planet desperately needs our help and
gas-guzzling cars and trucks must be phased out forthwith. Henceforth no
vehicles delivering less than 100 miles-per-gallon will be permitted to be
manufactured. To combat light pollution, inside as well as out, no lights
emitting more than 50 lumens (that’s physics for ‘fuck-all’) will be available
for sale. Music systems will be limited to a maximum 5 Watts rms per channel
and to save on space heating costs, room heights will be lowered to 2m. If this
means breeding shorter people with enormous eyes and ears this is surely a
small price to pay.
To assist in our low-energy future, gravity will be
turned down by 20% so that all lifting mechanisms will need to do less work and
daylight hours will be steadily increased to help with the light-saving
initiative. Also, all roads will be levelled, or run slightly downhill in order
that road and rail transport becomes more efficient and – possibly the greatest
boon to our green credentials – every industry will be relocated as far away as
possible from the EU region that our local pollution output will be reduced to
near-zero.
The New EU Physics Textbook
Left to the EU and its equally tenuous grasp on all
things rooted in reality including economics, nothing will ever again be made
in the great trade bloc and somehow its teeming millions will survive on near-zero
energy consumption and fallacious financials. Feeding the five thousand?
Feeding them bullshit, it seems. As the legendary Mr Scott had it, “Ye cannae
change the laws of physics, Captain!”
I am no great shakes at science or anything that smacks of academia actually. In the back of my mind though I have this feeling that it has been said that at the quantum level the laws of physics as we know them do not apply. So at the brain level being so small of those who decide on the rules and policies of the EU the laws of intelligence do not likewise apply.
ReplyDeleteThere cannot be any other explanation in fact evidence of it is everyday being uncovered as others in the world such as our politicians, rulers, religious leaders and more are proving to be very small minded and showing that normal intelligence does not apply to them either.
I agree with everything you said here. However I understand that the method in the madness is to reduce demand shocks to the supply grid by spreading a lower load over a longer time span rather than "saving" energy per-se.
ReplyDeleteI know that. But really it is about control. Instead of pursuing plentiful energy at the right price, they seek an unattainable dream which disadvantages the less well-off, as they always do. The EU is only interested in political power; they really couldn't care less about energy.
DeleteActually, the 2 Kw kettle takes slightly more than 1.5x as long to boil than the 3Kw kettle and is less efficient. Once the water temperature goes above ambient energy is lost from the system. The quicker it boils the less energy is lost.
ReplyDeleteOn such stupidities do civilisations founder.
Yeah, I wrote about this some time ago when the limit was first publicised. But scientific exactitude is lost on the average reader. Some people believe it takes as much to boil a kettle whether for one cup or full!
DeleteLike it. My personal "favourite" EU rule is the cookie policy which breaks most websites, even if implemented properly, I.e.not continually popping up on every visit. Connection to physics? Most EU websites will consume a minute amount of extra internet resource including power. I haven't done the maths but it would be a fun calculation.
ReplyDeleteActually you could make a reasonable case for low-powered kettles using MORE power in total, because they spend more time at intermediate temperatures, losing heat all the while - which is, of course, a time-dependent loss of energy.
ReplyDeleteBut all of that misses the point, as does your post I am afraid. The point of lowering the power of kettles (and everything else, in the fulness of time, is so that the windmills don't get overloaded. Nothing to do with reducing "carbon" emissions.